After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 657771 - Parallel build broken
Parallel build broken
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-documents
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME documents maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-08-30 23:03 UTC by Pascal Terjan
Modified: 2011-08-31 16:36 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Patch adding a dependency (367 bytes, patch)
2011-08-30 23:03 UTC, Pascal Terjan
rejected Details | Review

Description Pascal Terjan 2011-08-30 23:03:16 UTC
Created attachment 195259 [details] [review]
Patch adding a dependency

make -jn fails (tested with 4 and 24)

make[2]: Entering directory `/home/pterjan/co/gnome-documents/BUILD/gnome-documents-0.1.90/src'
  CC     libgdprivate_1_0_la-gd-gdata-goa-authorizer.lo
  CC     libgdprivate_1_0_la-gd-utils.lo
  CC     libgdprivate_1_0_la-gd-framed-pixbuf-renderer.lo
  CC     libgdprivate_1_0_la-gd-pdf-loader.lo
  CC     libgdprivate_1_0_la-gd-two-lines-renderer.lo
  CC     gd_tracker_gdata_miner-gdata-miner-main.o
  CC     gd_tracker_gdata_miner-gd-gdata-miner.o
  GEN    gnome-documents
chmod +x gnome-documents
  CCLD   gd-tracker-gdata-miner
libtool: link: cannot find the library `../src/libgdprivate-1.0.la' or unhandled argument `../src/libgdprivate-1.0.la'
make[2]: *** [gd-tracker-gdata-miner] Error 1

Here is a patch that allowed it to build for me but is probably not the best fix (I think the lib should not be listed in LDFLAGS)
Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2011-08-31 16:26:44 UTC
Thanks for the report; your patch was wrong, but Colin found out why this happened and it's now fixed in git master.
Comment 2 Pascal Terjan 2011-08-31 16:36:54 UTC
Yeah I thought of it, hence my "I think the lib should not be listed in LDFLAGS" but preferred to go to bed, thanks for fixing quickly!