After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 657300 - [abrt] evolution-3.1.5-1.fc16: g_wakeup_new: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 5 (SIGTRAP)
[abrt] evolution-3.1.5-1.fc16: g_wakeup_new: Process /usr/bin/evolution was k...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 655272
Product: evolution-data-server
Classification: Platform
Component: Mailer
3.2.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-08-25 06:26 UTC by Milan Crha
Modified: 2013-09-14 16:54 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Milan Crha 2011-08-25 06:26:09 UTC
Moving this from a downstream bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733146

abrt version: 2.0.5
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/bin/evolution
comment:        Selected one email, held shift, clicked another one about five
or six messages down in the same folder to group-select all of those five or
six messages. Evo stopped, looking 'hung' for a few seconds, then crashed.
crash_function: g_wakeup_new
executable:     /usr/bin/evolution
kernel:         3.1.0-0.rc3.git0.0.fc16.x86_64
reason:         Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 5 (SIGTRAP)
time:           Wed Aug 24 14:44:52 2011



Core was generated by `/usr/bin/evolution'.
Program terminated with signal 5, Trace/breakpoint trap.

Thread 6 (Thread 0x7f220efa6700 (LWP 1944))

  • #0 read
    at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S line 82
  • #1 read
    at /usr/include/bits/unistd.h line 45
  • #2 unix_signal_helper_thread
    at gmain.c line 4546
  • #3 g_thread_create_proxy
    at gthread.c line 1962
  • #4 start_thread
    at pthread_create.c line 305
  • #5 clone
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S line 115

Comment 1 Milan Crha 2011-08-31 09:03:43 UTC
I believe this is fixed with bug #655272, thus I'm marking it a duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 655272 ***