After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 651483 - String review
String review
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: pitivi
Classification: Other
Component: User interface
Git
Other Linux
: Normal minor
: 0.14.1
Assigned To: Jean-François Fortin Tam
Pitivi maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks: 621639
 
 
Reported: 2011-05-30 17:01 UTC by Bruce Cowan
Modified: 2011-06-25 15:53 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
String fixes (21.30 KB, application/octet-stream)
2011-05-30 17:01 UTC, Bruce Cowan
  Details
v2 without ellipses (10.93 KB, patch)
2011-06-12 23:09 UTC, Bruce Cowan
none Details | Review

Description Bruce Cowan 2011-05-30 17:01:47 UTC
Created attachment 188892 [details]
String fixes

Here is a patch to fix a few string errors I found.

Also changes "..." to "…", not sure if this is a good idea in Python.
Comment 1 Philip Withnall 2011-05-30 18:26:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Also changes "..." to "…", not sure if this is a good idea in Python.

Sorry for butting in, but hopefully this will be of some help:

It should be fine as long as the strings are marked as Unicode (i.e. “_(u'string')” instead of just “_('string')”), and the Python files are marked as being UTF-8 encoded (by putting “# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-” as the first line of the file).

See http://git.gnome.org/browse/totem/commit/?id=42679707cd3281843ea2f347785ff52e682ff196 for an example of what's worked in Totem.
Comment 2 Jean-François Fortin Tam 2011-06-12 21:02:56 UTC
I'm not sure why we need to use the … character instead of actual dots?
Also, while we're at it, for the string:

"You do not have a GStreamer source element to handle the '%s' protocol"

Maybe you could use:

'You do not have a GStreamer source element to handle the "%s" protocol'


Could you also rebase your patch so that it applies cleanly onto master?
Other than that, from the looks of it, it seems fine. Your attention to detail is appreciated :)
Comment 3 Bruce Cowan 2011-06-12 23:09:29 UTC
Created attachment 189781 [details] [review]
v2 without ellipses

Here's a rebased patch without ellipses. On hearing what would need to be done for it to work, I admit I sort of forgot about this patch.

Anyway, all of the changes are from the en_GB translation.
Comment 4 Jean-François Fortin Tam 2011-06-21 23:01:40 UTC
A slightly modified version will be merged as part of my 0.14-localization-issues branch.
Comment 5 Jean-François Fortin Tam 2011-06-25 15:53:41 UTC
Fix committed to master as d81ab8bc6d58f0fa9950a3074ce614037616148e