After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 650430 - (weird_marker) Wierd maker (@17) in output heading & incorrect doc assign to fields
(weird_marker)
Wierd maker (@17) in output heading & incorrect doc assign to fields
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: doxygen
Classification: Other
Component: general
1.7.4-SVN
Other Windows
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Dimitri van Heesch
Dimitri van Heesch
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-05-17 19:42 UTC by Lori Boyters
Modified: 2011-08-14 14:05 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
source file and PDF (442.48 KB, application/x-zip-compressed)
2011-05-17 19:42 UTC, Lori Boyters
Details

Description Lori Boyters 2011-05-17 19:42:42 UTC
Created attachment 187986 [details]
source file and PDF

So there are two bugs:
- The appearance of markers like @17 in the output.
- The incorrect assignment of documentation to fields that have the same name
  (but are nested in different anonymous structs; e.g. the fields addr, and subnet_mask in your example).

Regards,
  Dimitri
Comment 1 Lori Boyters 2011-08-04 16:57:46 UTC
Dimitri, Could you fix this bug before your release the next Doxygen build? We need this fix as part of our next major release of our files, which is currently planned for 31 August 2011. Thanks. Lori
Comment 2 Dimitri van Heesch 2011-08-14 10:31:36 UTC
I will correct the appearance of markers.
For the correct assignment of documentation it is required to enable the INLINE_SIMPLE_STRUCTS feature.
Comment 3 Dimitri van Heesch 2011-08-14 14:05:16 UTC
This bug was previously marked ASSIGNED, which means it should be fixed in
doxygen version 1.7.5. Please verify if this is indeed the case. Reopen the
bug if you think it is not fixed and please include any additional information
that you think can be relevant.