GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 649854
Backport a number of patches from git master (2.91.x) to 2.32.x branch
Last modified: 2013-03-27 09:53:43 UTC
Created attachment 187549 [details] [review] 01-no_recipient_meetings.patch We are using it with 2.32 without problems, please commit to 2.32 branch also. Thanks
Who is "we"?
Hi Pacho, are you kidding me? I see about 15 bugs with 0 information in them. If you want to ask for something like backport then contact David Woodhouse, directly, he's maintaining the gnome-2-32 branches now (mostly). Why to spam bugzilla with what was dealt with it already? Or if you really want to, then one bug with list of links to patches/commits or something. I do not know what to do with all your bugs. I will mark them as a duplicates of this, I think.
*** Bug 649855 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649858 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649860 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649861 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649862 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649863 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649864 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649865 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649868 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 649870 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
OK, so the above duplicates contain other patches Pacho filled into the bugzilla and would liek to have them committed into gnome-2-32 branches.
Thanks, Milan. As I type this one-handed with a sleeping baby on my shoulder, I really don't relish trying to make sense of that lot. A list of commits that I can pull in with 'git cherry-pick -x' would be nice. Or a tested git tree in which that was already done, and the backport conflicts (minimally) resolved, would be better...
Please consider also commits from bug #646117 comment #9, as was asked for in bug #645074 comment #4. Thanks.
(In reply to comment #1) > Who is "we"? I am a gnome maintainer on Gentoo (In reply to comment #2) > Hi Pacho, are you kidding me? I see about 15 bugs with 0 information in them. > If you want to ask for something like backport then contact David Woodhouse, > directly, he's maintaining the gnome-2-32 branches now (mostly). Why to spam > bugzilla with what was dealt with it already? Or if you really want to, then > one bug with list of links to patches/commits or something. I do not know what > to do with all your bugs. I will mark them as a duplicates of this, I think. No, I am not kidding you and I am really sorry for this. I thought was more appropriate to report them splitted to let us discuss for every patch if needed since they are different. I also didn't know who was maintaining gnome-2.32 branch. Again, sorry a lot, it wasn't my intention to make you angry :-(
(In reply to comment #20) > Again, sorry a lot, it wasn't my intention to make you angry :-( That's OK, I'm not that angry, it was rather kind of surprise.
List of commits: d5453070876d5992b93973250cb01a949e119828 30427e119ae1d6b26fb92ee5e3e2abe614c7668e f5562e96973341002675d504ab8245cd9ec3f3f4 5549b3311ff09e4ea83eeedd5e48e16e5530a0d3 750abd6bed42e55a26b972102132bca4e57473dd 0efc5f6217100ce0b35404137629642346b2d51a 7ddb3931b153c95641712a1e79732a359311bcec 84e2609c80f84392138d5d534d2486fa877173c5 fb1874306786d0ef9527463bfed870dc07915084 1a7b4d481cd322f901808461d831bfa40f346922 4b58f113f8d5399f103db891f0faa2a0deae7450 d132f8fd1c265b473954ab60d8b16db1f5aa04a8 06ba0287d7ccc395104f0dc77f71bd825d0558db 098a7abf652e5a1596801c466f0de0fb656b69c9 7215cf088f73cfa61e877a83fa0fdd4227095725 ca553fcb264a09b75b406d2eaed1942dc0af6f50
Could these patches be commited to 2.32 before releasing a 2.32.4 version? It would allow us to drop a lot of patches downstream. Thanks a lot
(In reply to comment #23) > Could these patches be commited to 2.32 before releasing a 2.32.4 version? It > would allow us to drop a lot of patches downstream. Thanks a lot I assume that's pretty obsolete now. Closing as WONTFIX.