After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 647808 - A global search project dialog
A global search project dialog
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 545389
Product: anjuta
Classification: Applications
Component: core application
3.0.x
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Naba Kumar
Anjuta maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2011-04-14 19:13 UTC by bosccowitch
Modified: 2011-04-17 18:13 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description bosccowitch 2011-04-14 19:13:57 UTC 
Hi,

I wanted to do some gnome3 developing and cant find my most used function in Codeblocks the Find in whole Project search, which quite helpsme a lot to get an overview where what is in totally unknown code/project. (especially in the gnome-shell c / js code mix where im still somewhat lost)

most of the time i create my own codeblocks project wich is a hassle.
Also phising for the shell grep construct is not as nice as you can klick in a list and jump right to the file and line with a result.

If there is already such a function you should also place it under Edit-> Search menu as i cant find it.
Comment 1 bosccowitch 2011-04-17 16:54:23 UTC 
hmm i tried the grep tool extension, but its not the same as an internal search as it can

1. crash anjunta if there are a lot of results and simply adds them all into the result list (happened for example for search like "app" in gnome-shell ;)

2. you cant reach the results by double clicking the results line you have to fish out the file in the brwoser manually and search agian in the file or scroll a lot
Comment 2 Johannes Schmid 2011-04-17 18:13:05 UTC 
We know that this is a regression for 3.0 compared to the 2.x releases.

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 545389 ***