Below is a case where the definition of a 2nd constructor is not matched to its declaration. The warning issued by doxygen says

doxygentests/test/member-function-problem.cxx:16: warning: no matching class member found for 
  B::B(void(B::*pom)
Possible candidates:
  B::B()
  B::B(void(B::*pom)())

It seems that the parser didn't properly understand the typedef (for MemberF), as everything works fine when the declaration and definition use the typedef.

Also note the missing brackets in the log message (line above "Possible candidates"). Maybe that provides a clue?

--------------------------
//! class doc
class B
{
public:
  typedef void (B::*MemberF)();
  //! def
  B();
  //! other constructor
   B( void (B::*pom)());
  // B( B::MemberF pom); // ok if using this declaration instead
};

/*! some more doc */
B::B(B::MemberF pom)
{}
--------------------------
Remarkably, the bug disappears when removing the first (default) constructor.

This seems related to Bug 356204, but I checked that 1.7.3 doesn't complain about those test files anymore.

I used doxygen -g to generate a default Doxyfile for this test.

Thanks

Kris