After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 636982 - 'What's using power' is a weird item to have
'What's using power' is a weird item to have
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gnome-shell
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.91.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-shell-maint
gnome-shell-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-12-10 19:40 UTC by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2010-12-17 19:23 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
the obvious patch (811 bytes, patch)
2010-12-14 21:54 UTC, Bill Nottingham
committed Details | Review

Description Bill Nottingham 2010-12-10 19:40:39 UTC
I understand how it's sort of cool, but it drops the user into gnome-power-statistics. This has a few things that make it not optimal:

1) it's jargon-ny - lots of things displayed as "IRQxx", or things like "Interprocessor interrupt"
2) it's by binary name, not application. For example, 'python', as opposed to whatever python program
3) it doesn't offer any remediation. As an end user, it might be good to know that something called 'pulseaudio' is causing ~100 wakeups per second... but what can they do about it? How does this information help them?

Also, the shell doesn't actually require gnome-power-manager, so it's a menu item that does nothing if g-p-m isn't installed.
Comment 1 Bill Nottingham 2010-12-10 19:42:11 UTC
I realize this could be assigned to g-p-m, to fix g-p-statistics; however I wonder about keeping the option in the shell until some sort of fix of that sort happens.
Comment 2 William Jon McCann 2010-12-11 18:32:28 UTC
That power statistics thing is really terrible imo.  It simply doesn't tell me what is using power.  If we can't have a way to actually tell me what is using power for 3.0 we should drop both this menu item and hopefully not show that powertop ui - ever really.
Comment 3 Bill Nottingham 2010-12-14 21:54:16 UTC
Created attachment 176433 [details] [review]
the obvious patch
Comment 4 Owen Taylor 2010-12-17 19:23:02 UTC
Thanks. pushed! (it's even better if patches are attached in git format-patch
format, for example, with git bz :-)