After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 635892 - Shuffle drop down menu can be confusing and is undiscoverable
Shuffle drop down menu can be confusing and is undiscoverable
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: banshee
Classification: Other
Component: User Interface
git master
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: 1.x
Assigned To: Banshee Maintainers
Banshee Maintainers
gnome[unmaintained]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-11-27 01:53 UTC by Alex Launi
Modified: 2020-03-17 09:01 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Move shuffle and repeat to bottom of interface (14.00 KB, patch)
2010-11-27 02:00 UTC, Alex Launi
none Details | Review

Description Alex Launi 2010-11-27 01:53:31 UTC
the next menu button with shuffle options can be hard to discover, and has lead to people (at least one) thinking Banshee didn't have shuffle.

This moves shuffle and repeat to the bottom left hand corner as cute little buttons.
Comment 1 Alex Launi 2010-11-27 02:00:44 UTC
Created attachment 175333 [details] [review]
Move shuffle and repeat to bottom of interface
Comment 2 Andrés G. Aragoneses (IRC: knocte) 2010-11-27 21:14:18 UTC
I already mentioned it in your blog post, but why not having it in both places?
Comment 3 Alex Launi 2010-12-01 21:38:53 UTC
No, that's just poor design. We're trying to declutter and simplify.
Comment 4 Matt Sturgeon 2011-02-27 05:42:20 UTC
I feel that this is a good move, so long a both have text displayed on the button (since there is more horizontal space on the bottom, so icon-only is unnecessary).

> why not having it in both places?
There is no reason to have a duplicated functionality, is there?

Off topic: If you are trying to simplify, why not put the seek-slider under the track info in the one adjustable section, vertically split, rather than horizontally.  That would save horizontal space, and allow for longer sliders, if desired.

So if this patch also puts the text of the current selection on the selector-dropdown-button, as well as the icon, then I personally approve of this patch, though it may take some getting used to for past users.
Comment 5 Andrés G. Aragoneses (IRC: knocte) 2011-02-28 21:13:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> > why not having it in both places?
> There is no reason to have a duplicated functionality, is there?

Well, normally in software the features are duplicated in the UI, for example you select an item, and you normally have three options to delete it: the "Delete" key, the Edit->Delete menu, or the context menu.
Comment 6 Matt Sturgeon 2011-02-28 21:18:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > > why not having it in both places?
> > There is no reason to have a duplicated functionality, is there?
> 
> Well, normally in software the features are duplicated in the UI, for example
> you select an item, and you normally have three options to delete it: the
> "Delete" key, the Edit->Delete menu, or the context menu.

That's a Menu item, a keyboard shortcut, and a context-menu item.
There may also be a toolbar button (although for delete it's a bit pointless).

But only one of each. One button. One menu item. One context-menu item. One button (if the function is worth cluttering the toolbars).

There's no need for more than one of each.
Comment 7 André Klapper 2020-03-17 09:01:06 UTC
Banshee is not under active development anymore and had its last code changes more than three years ago. Its codebase has been archived.

Closing this report as WONTFIX as part of Bugzilla Housekeeping to reflect
reality. Please feel free to reopen this ticket (or rather transfer the project
to GNOME Gitlab, as GNOME Bugzilla is being shut down) if anyone takes the
responsibility for active development again.
See https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/264 for more info.