After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 635444 - Monodevelop solution does not build
Monodevelop solution does not build
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: f-spot
Classification: Other
Component: General
GIT
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: 0.8.1
Assigned To: Tim Howard
F-spot maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-11-21 16:51 UTC by Tim Howard
Modified: 2010-11-23 08:45 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
A new solution that excludes extensions and is just the "main" part of F-Spot (13.27 KB, application/x-sln)
2010-11-21 16:51 UTC, Tim Howard 		  Details
A couple of Extension projects needed references to gio-sharp to compile properly (5.20 KB, patch)
2010-11-23 05:28 UTC, Tim Howard 		committed Details | Review

Description Tim Howard 2010-11-21 16:51:26 UTC 
Created attachment 174968 [details]
A new solution that excludes extensions and is just the "main" part of F-Spot

The Monodevelop solution does not build. After I upgraded my version of nunit to 2.4.8 (ubuntu 10.04 w/MD 2.4) I was still unable to build F-Spot and debug through Monodevelop. It seemed that the compiler was crashing in several places in extensions.

Once I dumped the extensions from the solution I was able to build and debug F-Spot through Monodevelop which is a very big deal for anyone looking to help out that needs to be able to view code quickly, assess their problem and submit a patch. 

I created a solution that excludes extensions. It seems to me we wouldn't want them in the main solution anyway as they are unnecessary for F-Spot to function.
Comment 1 Tim Howard 2010-11-23 05:28:47 UTC 
Created attachment 175087 [details] [review]
A couple of Extension projects needed references to gio-sharp to compile properly

This still requires make be run beforehand but it's at least functional.
Comment 2 Ruben Vermeersch 2010-11-23 08:29:23 UTC 
Review of attachment 175087 [details] [review]:

Looks good.