After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 634890 - [abrt] evolution-2.32.0-2.fc14: g_object_unref: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
[abrt] evolution-2.32.0-2.fc14: g_object_unref: Process /usr/bin/evolution wa...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 634305
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Contacts
2.32.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-addressbook-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-11-15 08:59 UTC by Milan Crha
Modified: 2011-09-23 13:50 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Milan Crha 2010-11-15 08:59:56 UTC
Moving this from a downstream bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652917

abrt version: 1.1.13
architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: evolution
component: evolution
crash_function: g_object_unref
executable: /usr/bin/evolution
kernel: 2.6.35.6-48.fc14.x86_64
package: evolution-2.32.0-2.fc14
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 14 (Laughlin)
time: 1289655954
uid: 500

How to reproduce
-----
Evolution was crashed when few entryies were moved from one address book to
another one by means of mouse drag and drop.
Actually, all the entries appear moved BUT one entry even being copied left in
the original location. This particular entry was neither first nor last in the
display order

ore was generated by `evolution'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.

Thread 1 (Thread 5991)

  • #0 g_object_unref
    at gobject.c line 2629
  • #1 addressbook_selector_merge_next_cb
    at e-addressbook-selector.c line 135
  • #2 final_id_cb
    at eab-contact-merging.c line 118
  • #3 add_contact_reply
    at e-book.c line 434
  • #4 reply_cb
    at gdbusproxy.c line 2163
  • #5 g_dbus_connection_call_done
    at gdbusconnection.c line 4971
  • #6 complete_in_idle_cb
    at gsimpleasyncresult.c line 702
  • #7 g_main_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 2149
  • #8 g_main_context_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 2702
  • #9 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2780
  • #10 g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2988
  • #11 IA__gtk_main
    at gtkmain.c line 1237
  • #12 main
    at main.c line 671

Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2010-11-15 11:24:05 UTC
looks related to bug 634305 which is against 2.30.x
Comment 2 Milan Crha 2011-09-23 13:50:28 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> looks related to bug 634305 which is against 2.30.x

I agree.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 634305 ***