After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 634055 - queue file operations when copying files from cdrom and other slow-seeking devices
queue file operations when copying files from cdrom and other slow-seeking de...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 124783
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: File and Folder Operations
2.30.x
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-11-05 08:49 UTC by Ron
Modified: 2010-11-05 10:48 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Ron 2010-11-05 08:49:11 UTC
Background:

I've recently been copying old archive CDs to my file server. I am also changing my directory structure at the same time. My work-flow involves:
1. navigate to directory A on CD
2. begin copying selected files to directory B on the server
3. navigate to directory X on CD
4. begin copying selected files to directory Y on the server

Problem:

Optical storage (and possibly other types of drives) has notoriously slow seek-times. This means that when multiple file operations are executed in parallel (as they do in GNOME 2.30), the combined transfer speed is actually significantly lower than if the file operations were performed only one at a time.

In my testing, 2 simultaneous file copy operations from the same DVD-ROM each run at less than 3MB/s. However, the same file copy operations performed by themselves manage over 11MB/s.

Suggested feature enhancement:

I think it would be desirable to either automatically or optionally queue file operations to be performed one at a time instead of in parallel, but only for file operations that involve optical storage (and similarly limited devices).
Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2010-11-05 10:48:46 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 124783 ***