After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 621776 - reply to all doesn't work as expected
reply to all doesn't work as expected
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 597473
Product: evolution-mapi
Classification: Applications
Component: Mail
0.31.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Bharath Acharya
evolution-mapi-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-06-16 12:52 UTC by Akhil Laddha
Modified: 2011-03-09 13:58 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Screen shot of original mail (20.60 KB, image/png)
2010-06-16 12:52 UTC, Akhil Laddha
Details
Screen shot with reply to all (30.10 KB, image/png)
2010-06-16 12:52 UTC, Akhil Laddha
Details

Description Akhil Laddha 2010-06-16 12:52:09 UTC
Created attachment 163814 [details]
Screen shot of original mail

evolution-mapi 0.31.4

reply to all doesn't pick all the recipients from original mail.
Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2010-06-16 12:52:34 UTC
Created attachment 163815 [details]
Screen shot with reply to all
Comment 2 Bharath Acharya 2010-06-18 06:24:11 UTC
It was not reproducible for me initially.

Then tried multiple MAPI accounts :) voila, happens in that scenario :) Assigning it.
Comment 3 Chenthill P 2010-06-18 08:20:22 UTC
Why would we want to change the current behavior to strip the email ids of the accounts which is already configured on that machine.

Say for example a friend of mine, sends a mail to personal+official email ids and i have both of them configured in one client. It would be great if the personal email id is stripped why replying from official account. So I feel this behaves better for this case..

Will this bug be an issue with proxy case ?
Comment 4 Bharath Acharya 2010-06-18 09:48:30 UTC
The issue:
-> Reply to all strips the mail ids of all accounts configured on a user's machine.

Yep as discussed, proxy should also be affected. Haven't tested it though.

Maybe the case you mentioned is a one off case, but we cannot expect some magic for it :) You cannot silently strip off a recipient because you have the account configured. You cannot document such a case to the user.

I tried to find the history of when we changed this, but couldn't get it. But yes we need to change this behavior. I wanted to know if this was changed for a reason.
Comment 5 Milan Crha 2010-06-21 07:48:45 UTC
duplicate of bug #597473, I suppose.
Comment 6 Milan Crha 2011-03-09 13:58:15 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 597473 ***