After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 609037 - crash in Open Folder: I had just selected "rem...
crash in Open Folder: I had just selected "rem...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 591660
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.28.x
Other All
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2010-02-05 00:31 UTC by Carl.Witty
Modified: 2010-02-05 04:10 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.27/2.28



Description Carl.Witty 2010-02-05 00:31:12 UTC
Version: 2.28.4

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I had just selected "remove Flash drive safely" (or whatever the menu entry is) from the right-click menu.  It did unmount the drive, and then crashed.


Distribution: Debian squeeze/sid
Gnome Release: 2.28.2 2009-12-18 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.28.0

System: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 #1 SMP Sat Aug 15 19:11:58 UTC 2009 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10605000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Nuvola
Icon Theme: Nuvola
GTK+ Modules: gnomebreakpad, canberra-gtk-module

Memory status: size: 129028096 vsize: 129028096 resident: 32169984 share: 9195520 rss: 32169984 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1262726070 rtime: 47261 utime: 43917 stime: 3344 cutime:0 cstime: 2 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
0xb8056424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6ed2760 (LWP 3754))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 gdu_device_get_object_path
    from /usr/lib/libgdu.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-2.0/libnautilus-gdu.so
  • #8 nautilus_menu_provider_get_file_items
    from /usr/lib/libnautilus-extension.so.1
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #13 fm_directory_view_update_menus
  • #14 ??
  • #15 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_source_remove_poll
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
  • #18 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
  • #23 __libc_start_main
    at libc-start.c line 222
  • #24 ??
A debugging session is active.

	Inferior 1 [process 3754] will be detached.

Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal]


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/i686/cmov/libavcodec.so.52" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?)
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so.0" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?)
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libtheoraenc.so.1" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?)
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libtheoradec.so.1" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?)
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libgstcontroller-0.10.so.0" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?)
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libevdocument.so.1" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?)
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libXtst.so.6" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?)
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libXxf86vm.so.1" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?)
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2010-02-05 04:10:12 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 591660 ***