Bug 603058 – crash in Evolution: I had just started evolu...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 603058 - crash in Evolution: I had just started evolu...


Summary:	crash in Evolution: I had just started evolu...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 558076

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	BugBuddyBugs
Version:	1.5.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	Normal critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Evolution Triage Team
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2009-11-26 15:33 UTC by David Ronis
Modified:	2009-11-26 19:06 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.29/2.30

Description David Ronis 2009-11-26 15:33:19 UTC

Version: 2.30.x

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I had just started evolution and was reading my e-mail; I'd deleted one and moved on to the next unread.  One observation: one of the folders I'd read earlier seems to have gotten its folder-count wrong (it was showing 1 unread, while in fact it should be 0).

I'm running the git master as of ca 24 hrs ago.



Distribution: Slackware Slackware 12.2.0
Gnome Release: 2.29.2 2009-11-16 (GARNOME)
BugBuddy Version: 2.28.0

System: Linux 2.6.31.6 #47 SMP PREEMPT Mon Nov 23 11:22:00 EST 2009 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10799002
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome
GTK+ Modules: gnomebreakpad

Memory status: size: 224714752 vsize: 224714752 resident: 65179648 share: 27594752 rss: 65179648 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1259249332 rtime: 3639 utime: 3396 stime: 243 cutime:33 cstime: 6 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/opt/garnome-svn-2.28/bin/evolution'

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb5654710 (LWP 8304)]
[New Thread 0xab3ffb90 (LWP 8448)]
[New Thread 0xaffffb90 (LWP 8443)]
[New Thread 0xae502b90 (LWP 8352)]
[New Thread 0xaed02b90 (LWP 8351)]
[New Thread 0xb092ab90 (LWP 8320)]
[New Thread 0xb112ab90 (LWP 8319)]
[New Thread 0xb24a6b90 (LWP 8318)]
[New Thread 0xb2ca6b90 (LWP 8317)]
0xb5919171 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 219306

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb5654710 (LWP 8304))

#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 IA__g_spawn_sync
at gspawn.c line 386
#2 IA__g_spawn_command_line_sync
at gspawn.c line 700
#3 run_bug_buddy
at gnome-breakpad.cc line 369
#4 bugbuddy_segv_handle
at gnome-breakpad.cc line 440
#5 <signal handler called>
#6 html_object_engine_translation
at htmlobject.c line 2157
#7 html_draw_queue_flush
at htmldrawqueue.c line 187
#8 html_engine_flush_draw_queue
at htmlengine.c line 5569
#9 idle_handler
at gtkhtml.c line 390
#10 g_idle_dispatch
at gmain.c line 4065
#11 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
at gmain.c line 1960
#12 g_main_context_iterate
at gmain.c line 2591
#13 IA__g_main_loop_run
at gmain.c line 2799
#14 IA__gtk_main
at gtkmain.c line 1217
#15 main
at main.c line 621
#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Comment 1 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-11-26 19:06:45 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 558076 ***