GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 600915
crash in Evolution: I opened a new email, ad...
Last modified: 2009-11-06 04:49:43 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? I opened a new email, added several recipents and then closed the application without sending it. I received the Bug Buddy pop-up and then installed evolution-dbg so I could reproduce. Distribution: Debian squeeze/sid Gnome Release: 2.28.0 2009-10-27 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.28.0 System: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64 #1 SMP Sat Oct 24 17:50:31 UTC 2009 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10605000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Glossy Icon Theme: gnome GTK+ Modules: gnomebreakpad, canberra-gtk-module Memory status: size: 670126080 vsize: 670126080 resident: 38780928 share: 25694208 rss: 38780928 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1257474785 rtime: 285 utime: 259 stime: 26 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7f707f400910 (LWP 1786)] [New Thread 0x7f7088072910 (LWP 1779)] [New Thread 0x7f707ebff910 (LWP 1778)] [New Thread 0x7f7082ffd910 (LWP 1759)] [New Thread 0x7f70837fe910 (LWP 1758)] [New Thread 0x7f70899ae910 (LWP 1756)] [New Thread 0x7f708a1af910 (LWP 1754)] [New Thread 0x7f708a9b0910 (LWP 1753)] [New Thread 0x7f708bde7910 (LWP 1751)] [New Thread 0x7f708c5e8910 (LWP 1750)] 0x00007f70a176952d in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 218857
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f70a680f7f0 (LWP 1744))
Inferior 1 [process 1744] will be detached. Quit anyway? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] ---- Critical and fatal warnings logged during execution ---- ** e-attachment-view.c **: e_attachment_view_get_store: assertion `E_IS_ATTACHMENT_VIEW (view)' failed ** composer **: e_composer_header_table_get_subject: assertion `E_IS_COMPOSER_HEADER_TABLE (table)' failed ** composer **: e_composer_header_table_get_account: assertion `E_IS_COMPOSER_HEADER_TABLE (table)' failed ** composer **: e_composer_header_table_get_reply_to: assertion `E_IS_COMPOSER_HEADER_TABLE (table)' failed ** composer **: e_composer_header_table_get_header: assertion `E_IS_COMPOSER_HEADER_TABLE (table)' failed ** composer **: e_composer_header_get_visible: assertion `E_IS_COMPOSER_HEADER (header)' failed ** composer **: e_composer_header_table_get_header: assertion `E_IS_COMPOSER_HEADER_TABLE (table)' failed ** composer **: e_composer_header_get_visible: assertion `E_IS_COMPOSER_HEADER (header)' failed ** Gtk **: gtk_ui_manager_get_action_groups: assertion `GTK_IS_UI_MANAGER (self)' failed ** gtkhtml-editor **: gtkhtml_editor_get_action: assertion `action != NULL' failed ** Gtk **: gtk_toggle_action_get_active: assertion `GTK_IS_TOGGLE_ACTION (action)' failed ** Gtk **: gtk_ui_manager_get_action_groups: assertion `GTK_IS_UI_MANAGER (self)' failed ** gtkhtml-editor **: gtkhtml_editor_get_action: assertion `action != NULL' failed ** Gtk **: gtk_toggle_action_get_active: assertion `GTK_IS_TOGGLE_ACTION (action)' failed ** gtkhtml **: gtk_html_export: assertion `html != NULL' failed ----------- .xsession-errors (172701 sec old) --------------------- (gnometris:29304): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid uninstantiatable type `<invalid>' in cast to `ClutterActor' (gnometris:29304): Clutter-CRITICAL **: clutter_actor_destroy: assertion `CLUTTER_IS_ACTOR (self)' failed (gnometris:29304): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid unclassed pointer in cast to `ClutterActor' (gnometris:29304): Clutter-CRITICAL **: clutter_actor_destroy: assertion `CLUTTER_IS_ACTOR (self)' failed (gnometris:29304): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid uninstantiatable type `(null)' in cast to `ClutterActor' (gnometris:29304): Clutter-CRITICAL **: clutter_actor_destroy: assertion `CLUTTER_IS_ACTOR (self)' failed (gnometris:29304): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid uninstantiatable type `(null)' in cast to `ClutterActor' ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 596566 ***