After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 599944 - zoom steps seem too small
zoom steps seem too small
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 586025
Product: pitivi
Classification: Other
Component: User interface
0.13.3
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: Git
Assigned To: Pitivi maintainers
Pitivi maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-10-28 19:33 UTC by nyall
Modified: 2010-02-07 10:59 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description nyall 2009-10-28 19:33:11 UTC 
Currently each click of the zoom icons only has a small effect on the timeline. It takes a lot of clicks to zoom in/out a usable amount. I think the zoom steps should be increased dramatically to speed up usage.
Comment 1 Jean-François Fortin Tam 2009-10-28 21:32:35 UTC 
I would argue this is a duplicate of bug #586025 ; what do you think?
Comment 2 nyall 2009-10-28 22:51:29 UTC 
A zoom slider as in #586025 would be much more useful, but maybe the zoom factor for the buttons could be quickly adjusted until a slider is coded?
Comment 3 Jean-François Fortin Tam 2009-10-28 22:58:59 UTC 
My personal non-dev opinion is that this would have to be made so that the buttons "jump" through zoom levels, and not that the zoom levels themselves be reduced; many zoom levels is a very important feature for use with the scroll wheel (ctrl+mousewheel); otherwise you lose a lot of precision in editing.

And from my limited knowledge/guess, it shouldn't be more difficult to replace those two buttons by a gtk slider widget, rather than changing how the buttons behave. At least in theory.
Comment 4 Stephen Griffiths 2010-02-07 10:59:33 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 586025 ***