After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 596460 - (vtesun) crash in _vte_terminal_ring_append in vte 0.22.1
(vtesun)
crash in _vte_terminal_ring_append in vte 0.22.1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: vte
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.22.x
Other Linux
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: VTE Maintainers
VTE Maintainers
: 598458 598465 598704 598767 598987 599024 599157 599360 599439 599450 599616 599625 599760 599798 599898 600229 600406 600435 600436 600577 600598 600613 600669 600674 600679 600684 601326 601327 601332 601422 601429 601584 601721 601773 601791 602757 603843 607096 609351 609462 615863 626012 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-09-26 19:35 UTC by Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
Modified: 2010-08-04 16:35 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Fryderyk Dziarmagowski 2009-09-26 19:35:45 UTC
0.22.0 works, 0.22.1 crashes gnome-terminal, Terminal, geany, etc.

a trace (vte test app from src directory):

Starting program: /home/users/fritz/fuse/aquarius-sshfs/rpm/BUILD/vte-0.22.1/src/.libs/vte 

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xb7f5ce35 in _vte_terminal_ring_append (terminal=0x809d628, fill=0) at vte.c:306
306	vte.c: Nie ma takiego pliku ani katalogu.
	in vte.c
(gdb) bt
  • #0 _vte_terminal_ring_append
    at vte.c line 306
  • #1 vte_sequence_handler_cd
    at vteseq.c line 1063
  • #2 vte_sequence_handler_erase_in_display
    at vteseq.c line 2658
  • #3 _vte_terminal_handle_sequence
    at vteseq.c line 3293
  • #4 vte_terminal_process_incoming
    at vte.c line 3763
  • #5 time_process_incoming
    at vte.c line 13971
  • #6 update_repeat_timeout
    at vte.c line 14145
  • #7 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 ??
  • #0 _vte_terminal_ring_append
    at vte.c line 306
  • #1 vte_sequence_handler_cd
    at vteseq.c line 1063
  • #2 vte_sequence_handler_erase_in_display
    at vteseq.c line 2658
  • #3 _vte_terminal_handle_sequence
    at vteseq.c line 3293
  • #4 vte_terminal_process_incoming
    at vte.c line 3763
  • #5 time_process_incoming
    at vte.c line 13971
  • #6 update_repeat_timeout
    at vte.c line 14145
  • #7 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 ??

Comment 1 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 2009-09-26 22:31:04 UTC
There's a patch in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548388#43.
Comment 2 Fryderyk Dziarmagowski 2009-09-27 07:01:26 UTC
The patch fixes the problem. Thanks for info.
Comment 3 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-27 21:08:29 UTC
Oops.  Fixed.
Comment 4 Paul Sladen 2009-09-28 13:14:58 UTC
Behdad: can you provide the link to the git commit that you've applied (to ease backporting this into the distros).
Comment 5 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-09-28 17:43:25 UTC
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/vte/commit/?id=b7083d3cdbe31305de2fa2974919b3d105f9b740

I'll make a release today with this and a couple other changes.
Comment 6 Christian Persch 2009-10-15 23:05:14 UTC
*** Bug 598458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Christian Persch 2009-10-15 23:05:45 UTC
*** Bug 598465 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Christian Persch 2009-10-16 19:17:34 UTC
*** Bug 598704 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Christian Persch 2009-10-18 09:51:46 UTC
*** Bug 598767 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Christian Persch 2009-10-19 21:27:59 UTC
*** Bug 598987 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Christian Persch 2009-10-20 11:22:21 UTC
*** Bug 599024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Christian Persch 2009-10-21 14:20:19 UTC
*** Bug 599157 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Christian Persch 2009-10-23 12:40:57 UTC
*** Bug 599360 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Christian Persch 2009-10-23 19:17:16 UTC
*** Bug 599439 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-10-23 21:40:30 UTC
*** Bug 599450 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Christian Persch 2009-10-26 16:28:48 UTC
*** Bug 599616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Christian Persch 2009-10-26 16:28:52 UTC
*** Bug 599625 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Christian Persch 2009-10-27 16:36:24 UTC
*** Bug 599798 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19 Christian Persch 2009-10-27 16:39:36 UTC
*** Bug 599760 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Akhil Laddha 2009-10-28 12:42:21 UTC
*** Bug 599898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21 Christian Persch 2009-10-31 16:03:36 UTC
*** Bug 600229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-11-02 12:47:05 UTC
*** Bug 600406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-02 16:27:02 UTC
*** Bug 600435 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-02 16:27:24 UTC
*** Bug 600436 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-11-03 19:30:55 UTC
*** Bug 600577 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-03 21:05:43 UTC
*** Bug 600598 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-03 23:02:31 UTC
*** Bug 600613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28 Akhil Laddha 2009-11-04 12:36:00 UTC
*** Bug 600669 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-11-04 13:13:24 UTC
*** Bug 600674 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-04 16:37:07 UTC
*** Bug 600679 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-04 16:54:51 UTC
*** Bug 600684 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Albert Lee 2009-11-06 02:36:25 UTC
OpenSolaris builds 125 and 126 are affected by this bug, which is resolved in build 127 which includes a newer vte. This bug is tracked in Bugster: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6892167

For those running earlier builds, a workaround is available at http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12054#c4
Comment 33 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-09 22:59:31 UTC
*** Bug 601326 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 34 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-09 22:59:42 UTC
*** Bug 601327 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 35 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-10 01:19:26 UTC
*** Bug 601332 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 36 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-10 17:48:29 UTC
*** Bug 601422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-10 19:46:03 UTC
*** Bug 601429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 38 Christian Persch 2009-11-11 18:30:10 UTC
*** Bug 601584 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 39 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-12 17:41:56 UTC
*** Bug 601721 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 40 Akhil Laddha 2009-11-13 11:30:24 UTC
*** Bug 601791 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 41 Akhil Laddha 2009-11-13 11:32:28 UTC
*** Bug 601773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 42 Behdad Esfahbod 2009-11-23 18:32:29 UTC
*** Bug 602757 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 43 Christian Persch 2009-12-05 13:45:35 UTC
*** Bug 603843 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 44 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2010-01-15 19:15:57 UTC
*** Bug 607096 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 45 Behdad Esfahbod 2010-02-08 19:12:19 UTC
*** Bug 609351 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 46 Behdad Esfahbod 2010-02-09 21:21:30 UTC
*** Bug 609462 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 47 Christian Persch 2010-04-15 16:31:55 UTC
*** Bug 615863 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 48 Behdad Esfahbod 2010-08-04 16:35:26 UTC
*** Bug 626012 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***