After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 592717 - Evolution 2.24.5 now ONLY uses default account SMTP server
Evolution 2.24.5 now ONLY uses default account SMTP server
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 336337
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.24.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
evolution[smtp]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-08-22 16:20 UTC by jo3
Modified: 2010-02-18 03:14 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description jo3 2009-08-22 16:20:04 UTC 
The latest version distributed with Fedora F10 now only uses the default account SMTP server.  It no longer uses any SMTP servers associated with other accounts.  This used to work until this version was "automagically" updated by Fedora.
Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2009-08-24 05:25:33 UTC 
dupe of bug 490237 ?
Comment 2 Milan Crha 2009-11-24 19:24:15 UTC 
jo3, could you confirm the comment #1 please?

I'm not sure from your description, because there had been a bug that the send/receive dialog was showing the default account name, but it was sending through the correct account. That bug had been fixed, for sure in a development version. Whether also in the current stable, which is 2.28.x I'm not sure, maybe there not.

Nonetheless, Akhil's bug is about something different, not about UI bug, but about possible process bug. Thus I would like to know for sure which one you are complaining about. Thanks in advance.
Comment 3 Kilian Evang 2010-01-03 14:51:11 UTC 
The UI bug is still present in 2.28.1.
Comment 4 Akhil Laddha 2010-01-04 07:44:20 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> The UI bug is still present in 2.28.1.

It's fixed in master or unstable version (2.29.x), not in stable (2.28.x). see bug 336337
Comment 5 Akhil Laddha 2010-02-18 03:14:13 UTC 
I am closing this bug, please feel free to reopen if you see it again.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 336337 ***