After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 591881 - Internal error with both checksum plugins enabled
Internal error with both checksum plugins enabled
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: brasero
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.27.x
Other Linux
: Normal major
: 2.26
Assigned To: Brasero maintainer(s)
Brasero maintainer(s)
: 572840 589318 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-08-15 09:10 UTC by JK
Modified: 2009-08-26 18:03 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.25/2.26

Attachments
Logfile with internal error (18.06 KB, text/plain)
2009-08-15 09:10 UTC, JK 		Details
Detailed logfile of the described error (147.14 KB, text/plain)
2009-08-16 07:55 UTC, JK 		Details

Description JK 2009-08-15 09:10:05 UTC 
Hi!

 When both the file-checksum and image-checksum plugins are enabled and I burn some files (not an image) an internal error occurs when the check should start (see attached logfile). The logfile looks similar to the one I attached to bug #591880 but the context is different...

Steps to reproduce:

Enable BOTH checksum plugins and burn some files.

Note:

I was able to get correct results when only the file-checksum plugin was enabled, but I'm not sure if that would always be the case. Brasero's behaviour seems somewhat strange and inconsistent if the checksum plugins are involved...


Regards

JK
Comment 1 JK 2009-08-15 09:10:53 UTC 
Created attachment 140830 [details]
Logfile with internal error
Comment 2 Philippe Rouquier 2009-08-15 13:09:46 UTC 
Thanks for the report. There is indeed something strange.
Could you attach a (much more) detailed log to this bug please? (with "brasero -g > log 2>&1")
Thanks in advance.
Comment 3 JK 2009-08-16 07:55:41 UTC 
Created attachment 140867 [details]
Detailed logfile of the described error
Comment 4 Benjamín Valero Espinosa 2009-08-22 11:38:15 UTC 
*** Bug 589318 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Benjamín Valero Espinosa 2009-08-22 11:38:39 UTC 
*** Bug 572840 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Philippe Rouquier 2009-08-26 14:46:35 UTC 
Thanks for the report.
I think I managed to fix that bug. Please test and let me know if the changes in master solve the problem; I think they should. Thanks
Comment 7 JK 2009-08-26 15:24:29 UTC 
Seems to finally work now! Great...