After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 591467 - crash in Evolution Mail and Calendar: Pressed Send/Receive but...
crash in Evolution Mail and Calendar: Pressed Send/Receive but...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 522955
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: BugBuddyBugs
2.26.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-08-11 17:04 UTC by mjs
Modified: 2009-08-11 20:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.25/2.26


Description mjs 2009-08-11 17:04:10 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Pressed Send/Receive button.


Distribution: Fedora release 11 (Leonidas)
Gnome Release: 2.26.3 2009-07-07 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.26.0

System: Linux 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jul 29 16:02:42 EDT 2009 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10601901
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Nodoka
Icon Theme: Fedora
GTK+ Modules: canberra-gtk-module, pk-gtk-module, gnomebreakpad

Memory status: size: 718303232 vsize: 718303232 resident: 29712384 share: 12455936 rss: 29712384 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1250009470 rtime: 138 utime: 110 stime: 28 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/libexec/evolution/2.26/evolution-exchange-storage'

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7fc7a845c910 (LWP 3482)]
0x00007fc7a5d30a2d in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 216884

Thread 1 (Thread 0x7fc7a845e7f0 (LWP 3481))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 g_spawn_sync
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 ??
    from /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 e_folder_exchange_propfind
    at e-folder-exchange.c line 649
  • #6 sync_deletions
    at mail-stub-exchange.c line 1119
  • #7 folder_from_name
    at mail-stub-exchange.c line 281
  • #8 refresh_folder
    at mail-stub-exchange.c line 1578
  • #9 connection_handler
    at mail-stub.c line 168
  • #10 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #13 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib64/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #14 main
    at main.c line 278 


----------- .xsession-errors (11 sec old) ---------------------
(evolution:3466): camel-CRITICAL **: camel_object_is: assertion `check_magic(o, ctype, CAMEL_OBJECT_MAGIC)' failed
(evolution:3466): camel-CRITICAL **: camel_stream_write: assertion `CAMEL_IS_STREAM (stream)' failed
(evolution:3466): camel-WARNING **: Trying to check junk data is OBJECT 'CamelStream'
(evolution:3466): camel-CRITICAL **: camel_object_is: assertion `check_magic(o, ctype, CAMEL_OBJECT_MAGIC)' failed
(evolution:3466): camel-CRITICAL **: camel_stream_close: assertion `CAMEL_IS_STREAM (stream)' failed
(evolution:3466): camel-WARNING **: Trying to check junk data is OBJECT 'CamelObject'
(evolution:3466): camel-CRITICAL **: camel_object_is: assertion `check_magic(o, ctype, CAMEL_OBJECT_MAGIC)' failed
(evolution:3466): camel-CRITICAL **: camel_object_unref: assertion `CAMEL_IS_OBJECT(o)' failed
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-08-11 19:51:11 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 522967 ***
Comment 2 Willie Walker 2009-08-11 20:17:37 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
> our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you
> find.
> 
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 522967 ***

Eeks! I think you might have mistyped the bug number.
Comment 3 André Klapper 2009-08-11 20:27:50 UTC 
Reopening.
Comment 4 André Klapper 2009-08-11 20:29:49 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 522955 ***