After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 590866 - Faster suspend
Faster suspend
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: gnome-power-manager
Classification: Deprecated
Component: gnome-power-manager
2.27.x
Other Linux
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Power Manager Maintainer(s)
GNOME Power Manager Maintainer(s)
Depends on: 590865
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-08-05 15:21 UTC by Loïc Minier
Modified: 2020-11-06 20:15 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Loïc Minier 2009-08-05 15:21:59 UTC 
Hi

When I suspend by pressing my laptop's sleep key or when clicking the GPM icon,
I don't need any fadeout and in fact would prefer if the screensaver would not
delay suspending at all.  I think the fadeouts are sensible for all the other
cases though, so I propose adding a flag to skip the locking delay or a
parameter to specify which delay to use for this locking operation to the API.

I filed bug #590865 against gnome-screensaver to track addition of this API.

Do you think this is a sensible change for GPM?

Cheers
Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2009-08-06 08:32:46 UTC 
I guess making the dim time shorter makes sense, depends what the gnome-screensaver maintainer says.
Comment 2 André Klapper 2020-11-06 20:15:01 UTC 
bugzilla.gnome.org is being replaced by gitlab.gnome.org. We are closing all old bug reports in Bugzilla which have not seen updates for many years.

If you can still reproduce this issue in a currently supported version of GNOME (currently that would be 3.38), then please feel free to report it at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-power-manager/-/issues/

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry it could not be fixed.