Bug 58844 – the session manager crashed (i guess)

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 58844 - the session manager crashed (i guess)


Summary:	the session manager crashed (i guess)


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 38666

Product:	gnome-core
Classification:	Deprecated
Component:	gsm
Version:	1.2.x
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	Normal normal
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	gnome-core Maintainers
QA Contact:	gnome-core Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2001-08-11 06:20 UTC by charmer
Modified:	2004-12-22 21:47 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	---

Description charmer 2001-08-11 06:20:51 UTC

Package:  gnome-core
Severity: normal
Version:  1.2.4
Synopsis: the session manager crashed (i guess)
Class:    sw-bug

Distribution: Red Hat Linux release 7.0 (Guinness)
System: Linux 2.2.17-14 i586 unknown
C library: glibc-2.2-12
C compiler: 2.96
glib: 1.2.8
GTK+: 1.2.8
ORBit: ORBit 0.5.6
gnome-libs: gnome-libs 1.2.8
libxml: 1.8.10
gnome-print: gnome-print-0.25-8_helix_1
gnome-core: gnome-core 1.2.4


Description:
the session manager crashed, for no obvious reason.

right before this happened, the display greyed out and displayed
the "are you sure you want to logout?" dialog.  i'm not sure why
this happened, unless i accidently hit a key which provoked it.
but i clocked on the "cancel" button.

i suspect the X server (an ethernet connected NCD X terminal)
ran out of memory for new windows and stuff.  it was quite low
on memory, though not completely out.  it has 16 Mbyte of ram.

the LInux box is a 120 MHz Pentium with 32 Mbyte of ram and
a lot of swap space.  it might have been performance or memory
constrained as well.


Debugging information:
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...0x40591869 in __wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 8335

#0 __wait4
from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 __DTOR_END__
from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 gnome_segv_handle
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui.so.32
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 SmsShutdownCancelled
from /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6
#5 remove_client
#6 remove_client
#7 _SmsProcessMessage
from /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6
#8 IceProcessMessages
from /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6
#9 process_ice_messages
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui.so.32
#10 gdk_io_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgdk-1.2.so.0
#11 g_io_unix_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0
#12 g_main_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0
#13 g_main_iterate
from /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0
#14 g_main_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0
#15 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0
#16 main
#17 __libc_start_main
at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c line 129
#0 __wait4
from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 __DTOR_END__
from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 gnome_segv_handle
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui.so.32
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 SmsShutdownCancelled
from /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6
#5 remove_client
#6 remove_client
#7 _SmsProcessMessage
from /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6





------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2001-08-11 02:20 -------

The original reporter (charmer@punchdown.org) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, gnome-core-maint@bugzilla.gnome.org.

Comment 1 Kjartan Maraas 2001-08-24 17:09:01 UTC

Please upgrade to the latest packages and see if that fixes it for
you. Your release is fairly old by now.

Comment 2 Kjartan Maraas 2001-08-29 10:33:07 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38666 ***