GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 586103
crash in Open Folder: I have closed the Nautil...
Last modified: 2009-06-17 12:51:32 UTC
Version: 2.26.2 What were you doing when the application crashed? I have closed the Nautilus program with Ctrl W Distribution: Debian squeeze/sid Gnome Release: 2.26.1 2009-04-14 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.26.0 System: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Mar 27 04:02:59 UTC 2009 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10402000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Gorilla Icon Theme: Gorilla GTK+ Modules: gnomebreakpad, canberra-gtk-module Memory status: size: 349515776 vsize: 349515776 resident: 28102656 share: 19038208 rss: 28102656 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1245230605 rtime: 235 utime: 200 stime: 35 cutime:525 cstime: 83 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7f151e9aa7f0 (LWP 4979)] 0x00007f151a23631f in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 216045
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f151e9aa7f0 (LWP 4979))
----------- .xsession-errors (436432 sec old) --------------------- [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #296:983040->999423, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #296:999424->1015807, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #296:1015808->1032191, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #296:1032192->1048575, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #331:65536->81919, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #331:81920->98303, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #331:98304->114687, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #331:114688->131071, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #331:131072->147455, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #331:147456->163839, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #331:163840->180223, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #331:180224->196607, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. [Unknown [FAKE: "Azureus 2.6.0.0"]]decodePiece(): Peer has sent piece #331:196608->212991, but expired piece block discarded as never requested. ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
This crash is reproduceable all the time.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so and reopen this bug or report a new one. Thanks in advance!
I already had Nautilus dbg package installed the first time I reported but I've tried to install more dbg packages for its extensions and gvfs, etc, made sure I have glib and gtk ones. Unfortunately the stack trace is identical. What other dbg packages should I install?
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 584745 ***