After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 584262 - use gnome-icon-theme new icons
use gnome-icon-theme new icons
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 547261
Product: empathy
Classification: Core
Component: Artwork
2.27.x
Other All
: Normal trivial
: ---
Assigned To: empathy-maint
sjoerd[moblin]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-05-30 08:33 UTC by Nicolò Chieffo
Modified: 2009-08-28 22:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.27/2.28



Description Nicolò Chieffo 2009-05-30 08:33:22 UTC
Please describe the problem:
There are brand new status icons in gnome-icon-theme, committed to trunk (preview http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=135593&action=view ) is it possible that empathy uses them instead of the old ones?

Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 Xavier Claessens 2009-05-30 09:00:50 UTC
Thanks for pointing me that.

It seems to not respect the icon naming spec[1], which is in fact a good idea because I told many times that the spec is wrong.

So is it correct to map our presence to those icons?

MC_PRESENCE_OFFLINE -> user-offline
MC_PRESENCE_AVAILABLE -> user-online
MC_PRESENCE_AWAY -> user-away
MC_PRESENCE_EXTENDED_AWAY -> user-idle ???
MC_PRESENCE_HIDDEN -> user-invisible
MC_PRESENCE_DO_NOT_DISTURB -> user-busy

[1] http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html
Comment 2 Nicolò Chieffo 2009-05-30 09:23:44 UTC
Well, I don't know... I've not designed those icons, but in my opinion you should invert away and idle.

because idle means inactive (so MC_PRESENCE_AWAY, for a short period), and away means not here, gone in another place (so MC_PRESENCE_EXTENDED_AWAY, away for a long period).

Do you confirm? (I'm not native english speaking)
Comment 3 Nicolò Chieffo 2009-05-30 09:27:12 UTC
Sorry, I was wrong. I checked the specification and idle means away for a long time!
Comment 4 Nicolò Chieffo 2009-06-04 14:38:53 UTC
Here's the link to the git commit, for interested people. I noticed that it is not in the master branch, I hope it will be merged.

http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gnome-icon-theme/commit/?h=one-canvas&id=65b1065fb1bb246aa1b838a78449c6736aeecae4
Comment 5 Michael Monreal 2009-08-21 16:30:27 UTC
I don't think "MC_PRESENCE_EXTENDED_AWAY -> user-idle" is the correct mapping: 

"away" is something I would use while watching tv or going for a short shopping trip.

"extended away" seems to be a longer period for me... like going to vacations etc (for those who don't turn their PCs off...)

That said, I don't see a way to set extended away with Empathy... maybe just use the same icon for both aways? If not, maybe a special extended away could be added to the spec... I was thinking of a small island, water, palm etc :)
Comment 6 Nicolò Chieffo 2009-08-21 16:31:55 UTC
Extended away is set automatically after 45 minutes or something like that (hardcoded value)
Comment 7 Michael Monreal 2009-08-21 16:36:58 UTC
So empathy uses this like "auto away" (what pidgin calls it iirc)? Strange...

Anyway, in addition to adding the status icons, another change in one-canvas was that the IM protocol icons have been removed, so Empathy will have to start ship it's own copies in 2.29. Taking a look at pidgin for the protocols is worth it imho, the ICQ icon for example is much nicer.
Comment 8 Michael Monreal 2009-08-21 17:07:42 UTC
After a bit of google I think the problem with XA is that it means diffetent things in different clients/protocols but in any case, the idle icon is not a good match because XA normally means the user is not near the PC, while the idle icon seems to suggest he/she is sleeping in front of the PC...
Comment 9 William Jon McCann 2009-08-28 21:41:50 UTC
Is this the same issue as bug #547261?
Comment 10 Nicolò Chieffo 2009-08-28 22:06:32 UTC
Yes
Comment 11 William Jon McCann 2009-08-28 22:20:22 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 547261 ***