After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 584254 - cannot synchronize, "ProgrammingError: You must not use 8-bit bytestrings"
cannot synchronize, "ProgrammingError: You must not use 8-bit bytestrings"
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 583823
Product: conduit
Classification: Other
Component: GUI
0.3.x
Other All
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: conduit-maint@gnome.bugs
conduit-maint@gnome.bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-05-30 06:09 UTC by Autiwa
Modified: 2009-08-14 00:23 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Autiwa 2009-05-30 06:09:53 UTC
Please describe the problem:
I currently cannot synchronize all my directories (exept one or two) because the synchronisation start, et get freezed at a percentage. 

I ran conduit in command line to see the errors and I get this :
ProgrammingError: You must not use 8-bit bytestrings unless you use a text_factory that can interpret 8-bit bytestrings (like text_factory = str). It is highly recommended that you instead just switch your application to Unicode strings.

[Main                ][INFO   ] Setting global cancel flag (Main.py:305)
[Main                ][INFO   ] Stopping Synchronization threads (Main.py:309)
[Syncronization      ][WARNING] Conduit already in queue (alive: True) (Synchronization.py:77)
[Syncronization      ][WARNING] Cancelling thread (Synchronization.py:80)
Processus arrêté


Steps to reproduce:
1. run conduit
2. start a synchronisation
3. wait for freeze


Actual results:
synchronisation get freezed even if the program doesn't display any error in the GUI.

Expected results:
synchronisation reach 100%

Does this happen every time?
yes

Other information:
I use conduit v0.3.15
Comment 1 sam tygier 2009-08-14 00:23:39 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 583823 ***