After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 582798 - Nautilus should warn when opening lots of files with with separate application instances
Nautilus should warn when opening lots of files with with separate applicatio...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 596577
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.26.x
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-05-15 17:47 UTC by Pekka Vuorela
Modified: 2010-07-21 22:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.25/2.26



Description Pekka Vuorela 2009-05-15 17:47:00 UTC
Please describe the problem:
Some programs have .desktop files with %f or %u on the "Exec=" line instead of the upper case versions, either because of application limitations or bugs. When a lot of files are opened with such applications, an instance is started for each file. This can cause the system to freeze for a very long time, possibly even bring the whole system down. 

With this in mind, Nautilus should warn before opening files this way when file count exceeds some threshold.


Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 André Klapper 2009-05-15 19:56:29 UTC
Do you have an example?
Comment 2 Pekka Vuorela 2009-05-15 20:26:49 UTC
Example as in more specific situation? Well, current Ubuntu (Jaunty) I'm using has %f in Exec line e.g. for Exaile, Vlc, and Xine. Thus using any of these to open lots of mp3 files at once results in system going mental. 

Now, of course the .desktop files are buggy in these cases but as these probably keep popping up, it could be the sensible thing for Nautilus to confirm if the user really wants to start over 100 applications at once. Or maybe even refuse to. I don't know if there are use cases for launching such number of applications at once, and if there exists such it might even then be better to execute the applications serially.
Comment 3 Marcus Carlson 2010-07-21 22:29:04 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 596577 ***