After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 581834 - Overlay mode workspace layout poor for multi monitor workspaces
Overlay mode workspace layout poor for multi monitor workspaces
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 581833
Product: gnome-shell
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-shell-maint
gnome-shell-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-05-08 07:57 UTC by myxiplx
Modified: 2009-08-27 20:53 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description myxiplx 2009-05-08 07:57:14 UTC
There are a few issues with workspace layout when using multiple monitors, but I'm reporting these as a single bug since I feel they're all related.

1. With multiple monitors, it's hard to tell where one workspace ends and another beings.  My choice of a dark background further confuses the matter, especially with different backgrounds on each monitor.
2. Workspace shape needs to be taken into account when tiling workspaces.
   (see also:  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581833)

These can be seen clearly in this screenshot:
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/tBAAa-CL1HcLWbl0qdTkkA?authkey=Gv1sRgCJDK77aPmuTOpwE&feat=directlink

What I would suggest is to:

1. Have a border around all workspaces, to guarantee a contrast between the edges of each workspace and the overlay mode background.

2. Use a better tiling algorithm that takes into account the shape of the workspace.  In my case, I think the best layout for my 4 wide workspaces would be to have them stacked vertically (on a single screen).  However, there are many possible monitor layouts (1 monitor, 2 horizontal, 3 horizontal, a 2x2 square, a 3x2 rectangle, even 3 vertical).  

Fortunately, all the basic layouts are all just rectangles with different ratios, so an algorithm capable of neatly stacking rectangles would work fine for the vast majority of situations.

I have no idea how you'd cope with things like T or L shaped layouts (which are theoretically possible), but I doubt you'd come across many people using those.
Comment 1 Dan Winship 2009-08-27 20:53:31 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 581833 ***