After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 577987 - Use the desktop bookmark spec for bookmarks / ~/.gtk-bookmarks
Use the desktop bookmark spec for bookmarks / ~/.gtk-bookmarks
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 147434
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: Widget: GtkFileChooser
unspecified
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
Federico Mena Quintero
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-04-05 08:28 UTC by schmirrwurst
Modified: 2013-06-14 05:33 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement


Description schmirrwurst 2009-04-05 08:28:43 UTC 
I can't use only  program from gnome or kde, both have applications that can't be replaced.
So my problem is when I open a gnome application, I have a file picker with desktop shortcuts, and when I open a kde application, I have other file system shortcuts...
It is no nice for me, but for people that I try to convert to linux, is very difficult !

I found out freeedesktop have already released a specification for that http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/desktop-bookmark-spec
It would resolved that problem ! Is it planed to implement is in Gnome ?
Comment 1 Vincent Untz 2009-06-16 23:40:35 UTC 
This bookmark specification is used for the recent files.

I don't know if GTK+ people are planning to move ~/.gtk-bookmarks to such a format. Moving to GTK+.
Comment 2 A. Walton 2009-09-04 14:50:28 UTC 
Looks like a duplicate of 413076 or thereabouts (think we have several bugs currently open on the topic).
Comment 3 Vincent Untz 2009-09-04 14:57:42 UTC 
Yeah, the patch in bug 413076 would fix this bug, but bug 413076 is not really about this -- it would be some collateral feature :-)
Comment 4 Timothy Arceri 2013-06-14 05:33:05 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 147434 ***