After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 575986 - E-mail send delay needed
E-mail send delay needed
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 236121
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.24.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 585836 628007 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-03-19 17:18 UTC by Jarrod Hyder
Modified: 2011-04-05 13:59 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement



Description Jarrod Hyder 2009-03-19 17:18:37 UTC
I would like to see a feature added to Evolution to delay sending an e-mail for a specified time. I use Outlook at work and I have it configured to delay all of my e-mails by 2 minutes. This is usually enough time to realize that I forgot to add someone to a meeting request, forgot to add an attachment, or to realize that sending the e-mail is probably not a good idea. I can bypass the 2 minute delay by adding a "--" to the end of the subject of the e-mail.

This feature was recently added to GMail and I believe it also exists in other mail clients. If the Evolution developers could add this feature I believe it would make alot of people happy.
Comment 1 Alejandro 2009-06-15 11:09:43 UTC
Just my 2 cents !
I need it, too !

See:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585836
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585837
Comment 2 Alejandro 2009-06-15 11:13:16 UTC
Just my 2 cents !
I need it, too !

See also:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585836
Comment 3 Matthew Barnes 2009-06-15 11:44:33 UTC
*** Bug 585836 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Akhil Laddha 2010-08-26 12:21:23 UTC
*** Bug 628007 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Jean-François Fortin Tam 2011-04-05 13:59:40 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 236121 ***