After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 57014 - Attempted to use Modify of Entity Box
Attempted to use Modify of Entity Box
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 52836
Product: dia
Classification: Other
Component: general
unspecified
Other other
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: James Henstridge
James Henstridge
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-07-03 14:19 UTC by dpuliti
Modified: 2009-08-15 18:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description dpuliti 2001-07-03 14:19:03 UTC 
Package: dia
Severity: normal
Version: 0.88.1
Synopsis: Attempted to use Modify of Entity Box
Bugzilla-Product: dia
Bugzilla-Component: general

Description:
See short subject


Debugging Information:

(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...
(no debugging symbols found)...0x406555a9 in __wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 6732

  • #0 __wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __DTOR_END__
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 gnome_segv_handle
    at gnome-init.c line 659
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #0 __wait4
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 __DTOR_END__
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #2 gnome_segv_handle
    at gnome-init.c line 659
  • #3 <signal handler called> 
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#0  0x0 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.




------- Bug moved to this database by unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org 2001-07-03 10:19 -------

The original reporter (dpuliti@dpuliti.njsp.org) of this bug does not have an account here.
Reassigning to the exporter, unknown@bugzilla.gnome.org.
Reassigning to the default owner of the component, james@daa.com.au.
Comment 1 Cyrille Chépélov 2001-07-03 23:14:26 UTC 
This is actually another instance of #52386, which has been fixed for
a while in CVS. James: we really need a release.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 52386 ***
Comment 2 Cyrille Chépélov 2001-08-01 23:47:27 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 52836 ***
Comment 3 Alan Horkan 2003-04-07 19:18:23 UTC 
soooooo many duplicates of this bug

verified 
and 
closed