GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 564788
crash in Evolution Mail and Calendar: Working in the calender.
Last modified: 2009-02-19 18:06:13 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? Working in the calender. Distribution: Debian 5.0 Gnome Release: 2.22.3 2008-09-18 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0 System: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 26 20:45:21 UTC 2008 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10402000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 261947392 vsize: 261947392 resident: 189526016 share: 23957504 rss: 189526016 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1229442430 rtime: 27260 utime: 25168 stime: 2092 cutime:78 cstime: 131 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xf66586d0 (LWP 3956)] [New Thread 0xf46feb90 (LWP 5252)] [New Thread 0xeacfeb90 (LWP 4144)] [New Thread 0xef6f4b90 (LWP 4028)] 0xf7fcf425 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 210865
Thread 1 (Thread 0xf66586d0 (LWP 3956))
----------- .xsession-errors (22693 sec old) --------------------- ** (gnome-settings-daemon:3800): WARNING **: Datei »/etc/gnome/config/General.ad« konnte nicht geöffnet werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden ** (gnome-settings-daemon:3800): WARNING **: Datei »/etc/gnome/config/General.ad« konnte nicht geöffnet werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden ** (gnome-settings-daemon:3800): WARNING **: Datei »/etc/gnome/config/General.ad« konnte nicht geöffnet werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden seahorse nautilus module initialized Initializing gnome-mount extension ** (nautilus:3830): WARNING **: Can not calculate _NET_NUMBER_OF_DESKTOPS ** (nautilus:3830): WARNING **: Can not calculate _NET_NUMBER_OF_DESKTOPS ** (nautilus:3830): WARNING **: Can not get _NET_WORKAREA ** (nautilus:3830): WARNING **: Can not determine workarea, guessing at layout --------------------------------------------------
may be fixed with bug 333224
Yup, I believe it is, especially when this one is for 2.22 too. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 333224 ***