After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 561413 - Changing of the "Show" combo box with mousewheel doesn't work
Changing of the "Show" combo box with mousewheel doesn't work
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.24.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
evolution[kill-bonobo]
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-11-18 19:30 UTC by Matthew Barnes
Modified: 2010-03-30 11:12 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Matthew Barnes 2008-11-18 19:30:57 UTC 
Forwarding this from a Fedora bug report:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472031


Description of problem:
If I change the "Show" combobox with a mousewheel rather than selecting from
available options, the selection is not onored in the folder view.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
evolution-2.24.1-2.fc10.i386

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. select a folder with some unread messages in it
2. change the "Show" combobox with a mousewheel to "Unread Messages"

Actual results:
the folder still lists all messages

Expected results:
the folder view should list only unread messages
Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2008-11-18 19:38:46 UTC 
That particular combo I know is using the old, deprecated GtkCombo widget instead of the newer GtkComboBox.  That might explain it.  In which case it's gonna be hard to fix right away.

I rewrote the filter bar in my "kill-bonobo" branch, so I'll make it a point to check that it's working correctly there.  We might want to add a small timeout to the combo box before initiating the search.  You can zoom through values pretty quickly with a mouse wheel, and we don't want to be overwhelmed with search requests.
Comment 2 Akhil Laddha 2010-03-30 11:12:58 UTC 
It's working fine in 2.30.0