GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 560726
"View" > "Switcher Appearance" cleanup
Last modified: 2009-12-16 22:20:13 UTC
0) There is currently a "View" > "Switcher Appearance" menu item. It needs a cleanup: s/Switcher Appearance/Switcher/ make "Hide Buttons" the top entry of the submenu (and not the bottom entry) s/Hide Buttons/Show Switcher/ the tooltip entries talk about "window buttons". How about "Component buttons"? 1) I'll try to attach a patch that illustrates my idea.
Created attachment 122622 [details] [review] "View" > "Switcher Appearance" cleanup Note that the "Buttons" idiom is rooted deeply in the code. This patch just replaces the the top layer with the Switcher idiom (which I prefer). If this is accepted it might be better to adjust all the code to the new idiom (except for the naming of the gconf entry?). No ChangeLog entry yet. Will add one after this is reviewed and ACK'ed.
The changes you're suggesting look reasonable but the code you're modifying is not long for this world. You might want to have a look at the "kill-bonobo" branch, which will hopefully be merged before 2.26, and try patching that. I can help with any build issues you run into. (Background info: http://www.go-evolution.org/KillBonobo)
Created attachment 149514 [details] [review] [RFC] reword and reorganize View > "Switcher Appearance" menu items 0) Just a small step: reword and reorganize View > "Switcher Appearance" menu items. Basically moves from: View Switcher Appearance [...] ---------------- [x] Show Buttons to: View Switcher [x] Show Switcher ----------------- [...] 1) Untested. But something similar works on 2.29.3 (I had trouble cherry picking my local commit into master). 2) Please check the other string changes on spelling, capitalization, and style. 3) Next step should be enabling/disabling the four entries below the separator depending on the "Show Switcher" check box state (or has that already been implemented in master?). 4) Note that bug #271482 might make this bug moot. In the mean time it still make sense to clean this (sub) menu.
I guess Matt is on this, but from my point of view the changes seem straightforward.
(In reply to comment #3) > 4) Note that bug #271482 might make this bug moot. In the mean time it still > make sense to clean this (sub) menu. Yes, actually, let's merge this discussion into bug #271482. Closing this as a dupe for lack of a better resolution. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 271482 ***