GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 559574
crash in Evolution Mail and Calendar: i closed application (ev...
Last modified: 2008-11-06 23:08:47 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? i closed application (evolution) Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.22.3 2008-09-18 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0 System: Linux 2.6.27 #1 SMP Mon Oct 13 00:22:24 CEST 2008 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10402000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 599666688 vsize: 599666688 resident: 49016832 share: 29442048 rss: 49016832 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1225967232 rtime: 379 utime: 310 stime: 69 cutime:133 cstime: 26 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x7f6dade2e700 (LWP 15907)] 0x00007f6da97235ef in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 209322
Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f6dade2e700 (LWP 15907))
----------- .xsession-errors (1288 sec old) --------------------- ** (amule:12405): CRITICAL **: clearlooks_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height >= -1' failed ** (amule:12405): CRITICAL **: clearlooks_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height >= -1' failed ** (amule:12405): CRITICAL **: clearlooks_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height >= -1' failed ** (amule:12405): CRITICAL **: clearlooks_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height >= -1' failed ** (amule:12405): CRITICAL **: clearlooks_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height >= -1' failed ** (amule:12405): CRITICAL **: clearlooks_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height >= -1' failed ** (amule:12405): CRITICAL **: clearlooks_style_draw_box_gap: assertion `height >= -1' failed ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 541872 ***