After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 557361 - Evolution says 'storing folder' in status bar for a long time
Evolution says 'storing folder' in status bar for a long time
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 568332
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.24.x (obsolete)
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-10-22 08:07 UTC by Akhil Laddha
Modified: 2009-03-03 11:28 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22


Description Akhil Laddha 2008-10-22 08:07:21 UTC 
Evolution 2.25.1 

Evolution completed migration of folders which are on 'On this computer', it shows mails of a folders. But when i clicked on other folder, it always displays 'storing folder' in status bar.  I waited for almost an hr but then also it didn't show any mail. 

Gdb traces of evolution which i have taken during the process with some time intervals


Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
(gdb) t a a bt

+ Trace 208519







Comment 1


Milan Crha





          2008-12-10 19:04:40 UTC
        



It seems it's trying to delete one message in the folder, but isn't able to.




+
Trace
    210675






    

  • 
#14
cdb_sql_exec

    
                at camel-db.c
                  line
                  64

    

    • 








But waiting in sqlite, somehow. See thread 18. I do not know what to do with that.
Maybe some changes around bug #558883 would help here to. Maybe not. (I'm thinking about transactions, but I do not know whether srag added there any finally.) 







Comment 2


Srinivasa Ragavan





          2008-12-11 10:57:31 UTC
        



Nothing to blame apart from FSYNC/ext3/*. Fsync(fd) doesn't sync that file, instead takes care of integrity of Entire disk :-) Which takes away everyting.

So, for Migration, we moved to in-memory tables. Im working out a solution, like what FF did to overcome my moving to a async-io-vfs for sqlite. 






Comment 3


Akhil Laddha





          2008-12-31 06:47:04 UTC
        



see bug 564204 also






Comment 4


Srinivasa Ragavan





          2009-01-05 03:45:56 UTC
        



I'm going in with a in-memory sqlite journaling to over come this for now. 






Comment 5


Akhil Laddha





          2009-02-23 05:01:19 UTC
        



shall i mark this a dupe of bug 568332






Comment 6


Akhil Laddha





          2009-03-03 11:28:11 UTC
        



Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 568332 ***