msgid "Abū Mūsā"
Ah, a small island with about 500 inhabitants, according to Wikipedia. Sure, very helpful.

msgid "Ad Dalfa'ah"
a very small town near to the big city of Brydah. Why not listing Brydah itself?

msgid "Allison Harbour"
a very small town in canada, while the big Canadian Vancouver (200km away) is not even available in the list

#. Translators: this is a city in Saudi Arabia
#: ../data/Locations.xml.in.h:570
msgid "Ar Ruqayyiqah"

Not a city. It's a very small suburb of Al Hofuf it seems. So why not using Al Hofuf?


#. Translators: this is a city in Texas in the United States
#: ../data/Locations.xml.in.h:760
msgid "Austin"
msgstr "Austin"

#: ../data/Locations.xml.in.h:761
msgid "Austin City, Austin Camp Mabry"
msgstr "Austin City, Austin Camp Mabry"

Is that needed? That's just 5km away from each other. I don't care about those 0.1F difference between city center and the military camp.


#. Translators: this is a city in Quebec in Canada
#: ../data/Locations.xml.in.h:826
msgid "Baie-de-la-Trinité"

It is "Baie-Trinité" and has according to wikipedia 589 inhabitants. This is just ridiculous.


The german towns are also in fact often small villages. I had to look up lots of them though I know this country quite well IMO.
In general: It's useless to list village names instead of big cities. I do NOT know the name of the third village if I drive west from the big city I live in. 

So do you really want me to hunt down the smallest villages in the middle of nowhere?

I stopped my translation efforts here and won't continue. Updating the po file looks like a huge waste of time to me.