After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 554542 - "Default" sort order of mail folders is random (previously by arrival)
"Default" sort order of mail folders is random (previously by arrival)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 563954
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
2.24.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-10-01 09:01 UTC by scott
Modified: 2009-10-22 14:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.23/2.24



Description scott 2008-10-01 09:01:24 UTC
Please describe the problem:
Since the 2.23.x release where the summary format switched to sqlite, the "default" sort order of a folder has gone from being useful by arrival to effectively random.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Wipe .evolution directory
2. Start evolution and let it sync with mail server



Actual results:
INBOX is in a strange order.

Expected results:
INBOX is in by-arrival order.

Does this happen every time?
Yes.

Other information:
Am using "sync mail locally", I'm not sure whether that makes a difference or not.
Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2008-10-01 13:59:19 UTC
An obvious workaround is to click the Date header.

IIRC the default sort order was never strictly "by arrival", I think it just happened to work out that way.  But there were usually some messages out of
place.  I think it's just _more_ random now than it was before.
Comment 2 scott 2008-10-01 14:21:37 UTC
Before it was the IMAP sort order, no?  The server is dovecot, it provides a very useful ordering.

"Date" order and "Arrival" order are different.

The previous default (and default in every other mail client) order of arrival means that when a mail arrives in my INBOX, it's always at the bottom.  "Date" means that if that mail has been delayed a couple of days, it goes somewhere back in scrollback and confuses me.
Comment 3 David.Wilson 2009-01-29 16:43:51 UTC
I can confirm this bug. It is very annoying. And I agree that arrival time and "Date" order are not the same. "Date" is dependent on things like the accuracy of the sender's clock and TZ setting, even if the message was not long in transit.

My IMAP server provides UUIDs which provide the same ordering as arrival time, so would be a decent key to use for a default sort order.

What is the sort key used if there is no explicit user choice?
Comment 4 Milan Crha 2009-10-22 14:20:18 UTC
As the other bug contains a committed patch, I'm closing this one as a duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 563954 ***