Bug 550789 - Missing GPL license text
Missing GPL license text
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: pangomm
Classification: Bindings
Component: general
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gtkmm-forge
gtkmm-forge
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-09-04 07:57 UTC by Michael Casadevall
Modified: 2008-09-08 13:22 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
pangomm-license.patch (18.31 KB, patch)
2008-09-06 04:28 UTC, Deng Xiyue 		none Details | Diff | Review
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Michael Casadevall 2008-09-04 07:57:42 UTC 
One of the files under examples is licensed under the GPL and not LGPL. Can you please add the full text of the GPL copying to the examples folder?

The file in question is: tools/extra_defs_gen/generate_defs_pango.cc
Comment 1 Sebastien Bacher 2008-09-04 07:58:46 UTC 
technically the tarball is not distributable due to that and pangomm might not be accepted to debian and ubuntu until that's fixed
Comment 2 Deng Xiyue 2008-09-06 04:28:49 UTC 
Created attachment 118145 [details] [review]
pangomm-license.patch

Proposed patch for license disparity of tools/extra_defs_gen/generate_defs_pango.cc.
This patch also fixes README which should mention pangomm instead of gtkmm.
Comment 3 Murray Cumming 2008-09-08 13:16:02 UTC 
What examples? I don't see any in svn. Do you mean pango instead of pangomm?
Comment 4 Murray Cumming 2008-09-08 13:16:32 UTC 
Ah, you mean tools/. Sorry.
Comment 5 Murray Cumming 2008-09-08 13:22:35 UTC 
I have commited that COPYING.tools file, and disted it in Makefile.am.

I did the same thing for glibmm and gtkmm, because this is not something new in pangomm. Please feel free to do the same in any other *mm modules in svn that you think need it.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.