After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 549473 - crash in Epiphany Web Bookmarks: changing zoom with Ctrl+...
crash in Epiphany Web Bookmarks: changing zoom with Ctrl+...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 525357
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] BugBuddyBugs
2.22.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Epiphany Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-08-26 17:28 UTC by alessandro.larcher
Modified: 2008-08-26 19:39 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22


Description alessandro.larcher 2008-08-26 17:28:54 UTC 
Version: 2.22.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?
changing zoom with Ctrl++


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.22.3 2008-06-30 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0

System: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Jul 18 17:46:56 UTC 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10402000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 372252672 vsize: 372252672 resident: 102252544 share: 29786112 rss: 102252544 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1219760834 rtime: 45067 utime: 41322 stime: 3745 cutime:2340 cstime: 190 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/epiphany-browser'

(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb6b7e700 (LWP 1259)]
[New Thread 0xa4be9b90 (LWP 1640)]
[New Thread 0xae5feb90 (LWP 1639)]
[New Thread 0xa53eab90 (LWP 1304)]
[New Thread 0xa5bebb90 (LWP 1303)]
[New Thread 0xa63ecb90 (LWP 1302)]
[New Thread 0xa6bedb90 (LWP 1301)]
[New Thread 0xa7befb90 (LWP 1299)]
[New Thread 0xa83f0b90 (LWP 1298)]
[New Thread 0xa8bf1b90 (LWP 1297)]
[New Thread 0xa93f2b90 (LWP 1296)]
[New Thread 0xa9bf3b90 (LWP 1295)]
[New Thread 0xaa3f4b90 (LWP 1294)]
[New Thread 0xaabf5b90 (LWP 1293)]
[New Thread 0xab3f6b90 (LWP 1292)]
[New Thread 0xabbf7b90 (LWP 1291)]
[New Thread 0xac3f8b90 (LWP 1290)]
[New Thread 0xacbf9b90 (LWP 1289)]
[New Thread 0xad3fab90 (LWP 1288)]
[New Thread 0xaff67b90 (LWP 1286)]
[New Thread 0xb2f88b90 (LWP 1285)]
[New Thread 0xb176ab90 (LWP 1284)]
[New Thread 0xaedffb90 (LWP 1283)]
[New Thread 0xb1f86b90 (LWP 1268)]
[New Thread 0xb3970b90 (LWP 1265)]
[New Thread 0xb4972b90 (LWP 1264)]
[New Thread 0xb4171b90 (LWP 1263)]
[New Thread 0xb5b11b90 (LWP 1260)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xb7f3e424 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 205707







Comment 1


Reinout van Schouwen





          2008-08-26 19:39:11 UTC
        



Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 525357 ***