After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 546127 - Screen handling malfunction
Screen handling malfunction
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 267787
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Calendar
2.2.x (obsolete)
Other All
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-08-03 19:02 UTC by Thomas Holst
Modified: 2008-08-03 21:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22



Description Thomas Holst 2008-08-03 19:02:34 UTC
Please describe the problem:
with a screen resolution set to either 800x600 or 1024x600 (actually the one i am using on Medion akoya E1210) you cannot set up evolution as the initial window overlaps the screen resolution and therefore you can't click the lower buttons. if you manouver yourself with the keyboard you may overcome this situation. anyway, using evolution is possible but the calendar features is not. here the "overlapping" starts again and no way to manage the UI anymore.....

Evolution UI needs to handle this shortcome with maybe a vertical srollbar. Window size seems to be hardcoded or reaches the min harcodes size a calendar window requires. 

Steps to reproduce:
1. at any time
2. 
3. 


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?
yes

Other information:
by the way the same happens with the KDE environment, specifically korganizer as well. maybe the new "netbook" generation of laptops need a little bit more attention in respect of the UI programming.
Comment 1 André Klapper 2008-08-03 21:29:03 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 267787 ***