GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 542969
crash in Tasks: Just trying to start up ...
Last modified: 2008-07-15 17:15:51 UTC
Version: 2.12 What were you doing when the application crashed? Just trying to start up and login Distribution: Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) Gnome Release: 2.20.3 2008-01-08 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1 System: Linux 2.6.25.6-27.fc8 #1 SMP Fri Jun 13 16:17:54 EDT 2008 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 648433664 vsize: 648433664 resident: 29814784 share: 20209664 rss: 29814784 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1216061108 rtime: 34 utime: 26 stime: 8 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 139996830128000 (LWP 1381)] [New Thread 1091443024 (LWP 1646)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x000000376be0e0bf in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 202813
Thread 1 (Thread 139996830128000 (LWP 1381))
----------- .xsession-errors (508192 sec old) --------------------- (Do:6176): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed (Do:6176): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Internal error: the configuration system was not initialized. Did you call _gnome_vfs_configuration_init? (Do:6176): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed (Do:6176): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Internal error: the configuration system was not initialized. Did you call _gnome_vfs_configuration_init? (Do:6176): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed (Do:6176): libgnomevfs-WARNING **: Internal error: the configuration system was not initialized. Did you call _gnome_vfs_configuration_init? (Do:6176): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_lookup: assertion `hash_table != NULL' failed ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 453932 ***