After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 542786 - easy comparison of photos
easy comparison of photos
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 306958
Product: f-spot
Classification: Other
Component: Browsing
0.4.x
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: F-spot maintainers
F-spot maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-07-13 14:47 UTC by paull
Modified: 2008-07-15 06:07 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description paull 2008-07-13 14:47:23 UTC
I once used a photo management tool in windows (FastStone) which had an excellent option to compare several pictures. In the browsing view you could select multiple photos (ctrl-click) and then choose "compare images" in the context menu. The chosen photos where then shown side by side in fullscreen-mode, which made it really easy to compare which image to delete and which to keep. When zooming in on a detail, all images would zoom along, so it was really easy to check which image was particularly sharp or which image had a certain spot better illuminated.

I often take many shots of the same subjects, so when importing photos into f-spot it is usually one of my first tasks to sort them through and keep only the very best of the duplicates. The comparison-view described above would greatly improve this workflow, especially if it would also allow to easily delete the unwanted pictures.

By the way: I would love a keyboard-shortcut for rotating pictures (in IrfanView it is simpyl "r" or "l" depending on the direction, and a keyboard-shortcut for deleting pictures from the disk; as it is, the delete button only offers to remove from the catalogue. In 9 out of 10 cases I want to get rid of the file entirely.
Comment 1 Maxxer 2008-07-15 06:07:08 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 306958 ***