After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 538234 - crash in Movie Player: watching a movie ;-)
crash in Movie Player: watching a movie ;-)
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 426990
Product: totem
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.22.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: General Totem maintainer(s)
General Totem maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-06-13 23:40 UTC by toni-bruns
Modified: 2008-06-14 09:48 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22


Description toni-bruns 2008-06-13 23:40:09 UTC 
Version: 2.22.2

What were you doing when the application crashed?
watching a movie ;-)


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.22.2 2008-05-29 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0

System: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 #1 SMP Thu May 8 02:16:39 UTC 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10400090
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 175345664 vsize: 175345664 resident: 82112512 share: 15372288 rss: 82112512 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1213399990 rtime: 5532 utime: 5275 stime: 257 cutime:1 cstime: 1 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/totem'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb68d1740 (LWP 14117)]
[New Thread 0xb255fb90 (LWP 14128)]
[New Thread 0xb2d60b90 (LWP 14127)]
[New Thread 0xb3586b90 (LWP 14126)]
[New Thread 0xb3e12b90 (LWP 14125)]
[New Thread 0xb4613b90 (LWP 14121)]
[New Thread 0xb54c0b90 (LWP 14120)]
[New Thread 0xb6170b90 (LWP 14119)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 200370

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb68d1740 (LWP 14117))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 g_type_check_value_holds
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #7 gst_value_get_fraction_denominator
    from /usr/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 




----------- .xsession-errors (206769 sec old) ---------------------
** (nm-applet:4028): WARNING **: <WARN>  nma_dbus_init(): could not acquire its service.  dbus_bus_acquire_service() says: 'Connection ":1.27" is not allowed to own the service "org.freedesktop.Networ
** (nm-applet:4028): WARNING **: <WARN>  nma_dbus_init(): could not acquire its service.  dbus_bus_acquire_service() says: 'Connection ":1.27" is not allowed to own the service "org.freedesktop.Networ
** (nm-applet:4028): WARNING **: <WARN>  nma_dbus_init(): could not acquire its service.  dbus_bus_acquire_service() says: 'Connection ":1.27" is not allowed to own the service "org.freedesktop.Networ
** (nm-applet:4028): WARNING **: <WARN>  nma_dbus_init(): could not acquire its service.  dbus_bus_acquire_service() says: 'Connection ":1.27" is not allowed to own the service "org.freedesktop.Networ
** (nm-applet:4028): WARNING **: <WARN>  nma_dbus_init(): could not acquire its service.  dbus_bus_acquire_service() says: 'Connection ":1.27" is not allowed to own the service "org.freedesktop.Networ
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Philip Withnall 2008-06-14 09:48:47 UTC 
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 426990 ***