After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 537495 - crash in Epiphany Web Browser: Downloading an image
crash in Epiphany Web Browser: Downloading an image
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 536768
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] BugBuddyBugs
2.22.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Epiphany Maintainers
: 537500 537556 537887 537895 538718 538838 538881 539034 539523 539636 539787 540060 540090 540121 540538 540589 540611 540620 540793 541107 541302 541336 541396 541587 541620 541727 541772 541775 542245 542407 542599 542608 542701 542779 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-06-09 23:39 UTC by gaougalos
Modified: 2008-07-13 20:22 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22


Attachments
bug epiphany (36.83 KB, text/plain)
2008-07-10 19:01 UTC, gbossicard
Details

Description gaougalos 2008-06-09 23:39:18 UTC
Version: 2.22.2

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Downloading an image


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.22.2 2008-05-29 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0

System: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 #1 SMP Tue May 27 12:45:24 UTC 2008 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10400090
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Mac4Lin_GTK_Graphite_v0.4
Icon Theme: Mac4Lin_Icons_v0.4

Memory status: size: 603246592 vsize: 603246592 resident: 150142976 share: 29802496 rss: 150142976 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1213053915 rtime: 13483 utime: 12921 stime: 562 cutime:172 cstime: 10 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/epiphany-browser'

(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x7fe4430a0780 (LWP 14425)]
[New Thread 0x42976950 (LWP 15504)]
[New Thread 0x4497a950 (LWP 15501)]
[New Thread 0x43177950 (LWP 14433)]
[New Thread 0x40811950 (LWP 14431)]
[New Thread 0x41974950 (LWP 14430)]
[New Thread 0x42175950 (LWP 14429)]
[New Thread 0x41173950 (LWP 14426)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0000003ef1e0e5ef in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 0x7fe4430a0780 (LWP 14425))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 dbus_g_proxy_connect_signal
    from /usr/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2
  • #7 notify_notification_show
    from /usr/lib/libnotify.so.1
  • #8 ??
  • #9 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so
  • #23 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #26 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 main
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0


----------- .xsession-errors (22552 sec old) ---------------------
(npviewer.bin:7200): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_hide: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed
(npviewer.bin:7200): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_destroy: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed
(npviewer.bin:7200): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_hide: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed
(npviewer.bin:7200): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_destroy: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed
(npviewer.bin:7200): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_destroy: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed
(npviewer.bin:7200): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_style_detach: assertion `style->attach_count > 0' failed
(npviewer.bin:7200): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_style_detach: assertion `style->attach_count > 0' failed
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-10 08:50:55 UTC
*** Bug 537500 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-10 08:51:42 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, the stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to
solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash.

Could you please help fixing this by installing some debugging packages [1],
start the application as normal, and try to reproduce the crash, if possible?

Once bug-buddy pops up, you can find the stacktrace in the 'Details', now
containing way more information. Please copy that stacktrace and paste it as a
comment here. Thanks in advance!

[1] Please install debug packages for epiphany, gtk, glib, libgnome,
libgnomeui, and the backend (for example webkit, firefox, or
xulrunner) (as far as those packages are provided by your distribution).

More details can be found here: http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces
Comment 3 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-10 10:59:36 UTC
*** Bug 537556 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-12 08:08:50 UTC
*** Bug 537895 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-12 08:09:03 UTC
*** Bug 537887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-17 07:59:40 UTC
*** Bug 538718 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-17 22:46:57 UTC
*** Bug 538838 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-18 07:56:59 UTC
*** Bug 538881 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Susana 2008-06-22 12:28:12 UTC
*** Bug 539034 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Susana 2008-06-22 12:28:24 UTC
*** Bug 539523 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Susana 2008-06-23 19:59:51 UTC
*** Bug 539636 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Susana 2008-06-23 20:00:07 UTC
*** Bug 539787 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-25 17:55:53 UTC
*** Bug 540121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-25 17:57:07 UTC
*** Bug 540090 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-25 17:57:29 UTC
*** Bug 540060 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-06-28 00:29:21 UTC
*** Bug 540538 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17 Susana 2008-06-28 13:34:47 UTC
*** Bug 540589 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 Susana 2008-06-28 13:41:45 UTC
I think this is a duplicate of bug 536768 .
Comment 19 Baptiste Mille-Mathias 2008-06-28 13:46:30 UTC
*** Bug 540611 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Bruno Boaventura 2008-06-28 22:34:36 UTC
*** Bug 540620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 21 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-06-30 12:16:24 UTC
*** Bug 540793 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-07-02 13:40:35 UTC
*** Bug 541107 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-02 20:39:43 UTC
*** Bug 541302 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-04 07:57:03 UTC
*** Bug 541396 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-04 07:57:14 UTC
*** Bug 541336 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-05 15:34:10 UTC
*** Bug 541587 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-05 15:35:35 UTC
*** Bug 541620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 28 Susana 2008-07-06 12:40:07 UTC
*** Bug 541727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 29 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-10 11:14:35 UTC
Reporters, in case it's not clear yet, we could really use some help on this bug. Can anyone provide a better stack trace?
Comment 30 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-10 11:14:48 UTC
*** Bug 541772 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 31 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-10 11:18:20 UTC
*** Bug 541775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 32 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-10 11:18:39 UTC
*** Bug 542245 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 33 gbossicard 2008-07-10 19:01:16 UTC
Created attachment 114344 [details]
bug epiphany
Comment 34 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-10 21:58:56 UTC
*** Bug 542407 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 35 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-07-10 22:17:39 UTC
Thanks. Now it's clear this is a duplicate of bug 536768.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 536768 ***
Comment 36 Baptiste Mille-Mathias 2008-07-12 09:58:49 UTC
*** Bug 542599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37 Baptiste Mille-Mathias 2008-07-12 09:59:02 UTC
*** Bug 542608 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 38 Susana 2008-07-13 20:22:00 UTC
*** Bug 542779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 39 Susana 2008-07-13 20:22:13 UTC
*** Bug 542701 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***