After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 534791 - Add multiplayer support
Add multiplayer support
Product: quadrapassel
Classification: Applications
Component: general
git master
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: quadrapassel-maint
Depends on:
Reported: 2008-05-25 16:47 UTC by Guillaume Desmottes
Modified: 2018-05-22 12:27 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: Unversioned Enhancement

Description Guillaume Desmottes 2008-05-25 16:47:10 UTC
Would be rocking cool to be able to play with friends as in gtetrinet.
For bonus point, we could reuse tetrinet's protocol if possible.
Comment 1 Robert Ancell 2011-12-09 02:24:46 UTC
Ideally this would use telepathy so you could easily find local people to play with...
Comment 2 Chandni Verma 2012-05-21 17:45:44 UTC
Is anyone working on this? I wish to complete it since I am already providing telepathy-networking and contact-support to other games - glchess and iagno. The common framework has been prepared and glchess is almost done applying it (with a little cleanup and formatting remaining).
Comment 3 Michael Catanzaro 2013-08-04 03:15:03 UTC
How does multiplayer Tetris work?
Comment 4 Chandni Verma 2013-08-04 16:32:38 UTC
I can't guarantee I will be able to finish tp-tubes in this or Iagno. Let it be the focus for a GSoC project.
Comment 5 Michael Catanzaro 2013-08-09 17:29:57 UTC
That's understandable.  But how was it supposed to work?  Two players playing separate games at the same time, just to be able to compare scores?  Or something a bit more elaborate?
Comment 6 GNOME Infrastructure Team 2018-05-22 12:27:48 UTC
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to GNOME's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: