After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 526747 - crash in Home Folder: i think there is a probl...
crash in Home Folder: i think there is a probl...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 483884
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-04-07 16:00 UTC by leopold_kogler
Modified: 2008-04-08 08:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.19/2.20


Description leopold_kogler 2008-04-07 16:00:10 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
i think there is a problem with nautilus filetypes and smb,
cause sometimes nautilus throws away all the icons and
gets confused about file types in the smb mounts;
in the moment it seems to crash when a smb-share is opened
with the naut browser.


Distribution:                    Solaris Express Community Edition snv_84 X86
Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2008-02-13 (Sun Microsystems, Inc.)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

X Vendor: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: nimbus
Icon Theme: nimbus

Memory status: size: 318214144 vsize: 318214144 resident: 137744384 share: 0 rss: 137744384 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 0 rtime: 14841 utime: 142603241 stime: 5811326 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
sol-thread active.
Retry #1:
Retry #2:
Retry #3:
Retry #4:
[New LWP    1        ]
[New Thread 1 (LWP 1)]

+ Trace 194505

Thread 1 (LWP 1)

  • #0 __waitid
    from /lib/libc.so.1
  • #1 waitid
    from /lib/libc.so.1
  • #2 waitpid
    from /lib/libc.so.1
  • #3 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 __1cNrun_bug_buddy6Fpkclp0_b_
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #6 __1cMcheck_if_gdb6Fpv_b_
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #7 _ex_text0
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #8 sigfatal_handler
  • #9 __sighndlr
    from /lib/libc.so.1
  • #10 call_user_handler
    from /lib/libc.so.1
  • #11 <signal handler called>
  • #12 nautilus_icon_factory_possibly_free_cached_icon
  • #13 g_hash_table_foreach_remove_or_steal
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_hash_table_foreach_remove
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #15 nautilus_icon_factory_sweep
  • #16 g_timeout_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_main_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_main_context_iterate
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 main 
Thread 4 (Thread 633 (LWP 633)):
#-1 0xfef04717 in __read () from /lib/libc.so.1
No symbol table info available.

Thread 3 (LWP    633        ):
#-1 0xfef04717 in __read () from /lib/libc.so.1
No symbol table info available.

Thread 2 (Thread 1 (LWP 1)):
#-1 0xfef04c07 in __waitid () from /lib/libc.so.1
No symbol table info available.

Thread 1 (LWP    1        ):
#-1 0xfef04c07 in __waitid () from /lib/libc.so.1
No symbol table info available.
#-1 0xfef04c07 in __waitid () from /lib/libc.so.1


----------- .xsession-errors (46951 sec old) ---------------------
/etc/X11/gdm/Xsession: Beginning session setup...
/etc/X11/gdm/Xsession: Setup done, will execute: /usr/dt/config/Xsession.jds
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2008-04-08 08:20:32 UTC 
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 483884 ***