After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 526009 - crash in Epiphany Web Browser:
crash in Epiphany Web Browser:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 516008
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: [obsolete] BugBuddyBugs
2.22.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Epiphany Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-04-03 17:01 UTC by matthew
Modified: 2008-04-04 11:24 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22



Description matthew 2008-04-03 17:01:33 UTC
Version: 2.22.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Unknown
Gnome Release: 2.22.0 2008-03-22 (Foresight Linux)
BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0

System: Linux 2.6.23.17-0.0.1.smp.gcc4.1.x86.i686 #1 SMP Fri Mar 14 14:19:36 EDT 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10400090
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 194846720 vsize: 194846720 resident: 59457536 share: 30420992 rss: 59457536 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1207241910 rtime: 748 utime: 709 stime: 39 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/epiphany'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb5b226e0 (LWP 5305)]
[New Thread 0xaefffb90 (LWP 5319)]
[New Thread 0xb2cddb90 (LWP 5318)]
[New Thread 0xae7feb90 (LWP 5315)]
[New Thread 0xaf962b90 (LWP 5313)]
[New Thread 0xb0163b90 (LWP 5312)]
[New Thread 0xb0964b90 (LWP 5311)]
[New Thread 0xb34deb90 (LWP 5310)]
[New Thread 0xb3cdfb90 (LWP 5307)]
[New Thread 0xb44e0b90 (LWP 5306)]
0xb7f74410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb5b226e0 (LWP 5305))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #6 google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::InternalWriteMinidump
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #7 google_breakpad::ExceptionHandler::HandleException
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #8 nsProfileLock::FatalSignalHandler
    from /usr/lib/xulrunner/libgtkembedmoz.so
  • #9 <signal handler called>
  • #10 ephy_node_db_is_immutable
    at ephy-node-db.c line 174
  • #11 resolver_found_cb
    at ephy-bookmarks.c line 975
  • #12 ga_signals_marshal_VOID__INT_ENUM_STRING_STRING_STRING_STRING_POINTER_INT_POINTER_INT
    from /usr/lib/libavahi-gobject.so.0
  • #13 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (856899 sec old) ---------------------
3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 'm'.3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 's'.
3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 't'.
3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 'u'.
3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 'v'.3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 'n'.
3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 'o'.
3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 'p'.
3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 'w'.
3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 'x'.3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 'q'.
3/24/2008 6:56:51 PM [Info]: Updated first results for 'r'.
3/24/2008 6:57:51 PM [Info]: Updated "Directory Scanner" Item Source.
3/24/2008 6:57:51 PM [Info]: Updated "Directory Scanner" Item Source.
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Reinout van Schouwen 2008-04-04 11:24:46 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 516008 ***