GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 521053
crash in Computer:
Last modified: 2008-03-07 20:24:12 UTC
Version: 2.18.1 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Gentoo Base System release 1.12.10 Gnome Release: 2.18.1 2007-05-04 (Gentoo) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-sabayon #1 SMP Mon Sep 3 00:33:06 UTC 2007 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Enforcing Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 367751168 vsize: 367751168 resident: 41586688 share: 27222016 rss: 41586688 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1204903357 rtime: 8083 utime: 7383 stime: 700 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) 0x00002acab09acb0f in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 191661
----------- .xsession-errors (8673 sec old) --------------------- ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so and reopen this bug or report a new one. Thanks in advance!
*** Bug 521055 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 459221 ***