After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 519839 - crash in Movie Player:
crash in Movie Player:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 449658
Product: totem
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.20.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: General Totem maintainer(s)
General Totem maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-03-02 02:44 UTC by Daniel Dickinson
Modified: 2008-03-02 12:40 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.19/2.20



Description Daniel Dickinson 2008-03-02 02:44:28 UTC
Version: 2.20.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.20.3 2008-01-12 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 #1 SMP Mon Feb 11 14:37:45 UTC 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 154087424 vsize: 154087424 resident: 33648640 share: 15880192 rss: 33648640 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1204425831 rtime: 241 utime: 211 stime: 30 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/totem'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb6e866b0 (LWP 14932)]
[New Thread 0xb225db90 (LWP 14941)]
[New Thread 0xb2a5eb90 (LWP 14940)]
[New Thread 0xb342cb90 (LWP 14939)]
[New Thread 0xb4016b90 (LWP 14938)]
[New Thread 0xb4817b90 (LWP 14937)]
[New Thread 0xb5073b90 (LWP 14936)]
[New Thread 0xb6129b90 (LWP 14935)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 3 (Thread 0xb2a5eb90 (LWP 14940))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #7 raise
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #8 abort
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #9 __assert_fail
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0
  • #17 ??
  • #18 pa_threaded_mainloop_unlock
    from /usr/lib/libpulse.so.0


----------- .xsession-errors (271135 sec old) ---------------------
** (gnome-cups-add:28712): WARNING **: Two ppds have driver == 'hpijs - HPLIP 2.7.10'
	->lsb/usr/hpijs/HP/HP-LaserJet_3300_MFP-hpijs.ppd (HP LaserJet 3300 MFP Foomatic/hpijs - HPLIP 2.7.10[0]) and
	->hpijs/HP/HP-LaserJet_3300_MFP-hpijs.ppd (HP LaserJet 3300 MFP Foomatic/hpijs - HPLIP 2.7.10)[0]

** (gnome-cups-add:28712): WARNING **: Two ppds have driver == 'hpijs - HPLIP 2.7.10'
	->lsb/usr/hpijs/HP/HP-LaserJet_3310_MFP-hpijs.ppd (HP LaserJet 3310 MFP Foomatic/hpijs - HPLIP 2.7.10[0]) and
	->hpijs/HP/HP-LaserJet_3310_MFP-hpijs.ppd (HP LaserJet 3310 MFP Foomatic/hpijs - HPLIP 2.7.10)[0]

** (gnome-cups-add:28712): WARNING **: Two ppds have driver == 'hpijs - HPLIP 2.7.10'
	->lsb/usr/hpijs/HP/HP-LaserJet_3320_MFP-hpijs.ppd (HP LaserJet 3320 MFP Foomatic/hpijs - HPLIP 2.7.10[0]) and
	->hpijs/HP/HP-LaserJet_3320_MFP-hpijs.ppd (HP LaserJet 3320 MFP Foomatic/hpijs - HPLIP 2.7.10)[0]

** (gnome-cups-add:28712): WARNING **: Two ppds have driver == 'hpijs - HPLIP 2.7.10'
	->lsb/usr/hpijs/HP/HP-LaserJet_3320N_MFP-hpijs.
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Philip Withnall 2008-03-02 12:40:06 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 449658 ***